Hi,
Thanks for working on this and for the feedback!
I've added the updated deparser testing module to the DDL replication
thread in [1].
We'll add more test cases to the testing module and continue the
discussion there.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAD30U%2BA%3D2rjZ%2BxejNz%2Be1
On 2022-Oct-20, Runqi Tian wrote:
> My question regarding subcommand is actually on commands other than
> ALTER TABLE. Let me give an example (You can also find this example in
> the patch), when command like
>
> CREATE SCHEMA element_test CREATE TABLE foo (id int)
>
> is caught by ddl_command_e
Hello:
Many thanks for providing feedbacks and sorry for late reply. I
updated the testing harness, please apply patches in [1] before apply
the attached patch.
>Not clear on what this means. Are you talking about ALTER TABLE
>subcommands? If so, then what you have to do (ISTM) is construct a
>si
Hello
Overall, many thanks for working on this. I hope that the objectives
can be fulfilled, so that we can have dependable DDL replication soon.
I haven't read the patch at all, so I can't comment on what you've done,
but I have comments to some of your questions:
On 2022-Oct-05, Runqi Tian wr
Hello:
I’m working on developing a testing harness for the DDL Deparser being
worked on in [1], please apply the patches in [1] before apply this
patch. I think the testing harness needs to achieve the following
goals:
1. The deparsed JSON output is as expected.
2. The SQL commands re-formed from