On 03/23/19 18:20, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 03/23/19 17:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've now pushed a somewhat-adjusted version of the XML-content fix
>> patch. The documentation patch needs some small rebasing to apply
>> after that one instead of before it.
>
> Will do.
>
>> Perhaps it'd make sens
On 03/23/19 18:20, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> Perhaps it'd make sense under the XML section in datatype.sgml,
>> but I think I might lean to making it a new section in Appendix D
>> (SQL Conformance).
>
> Sounds like the option (4) I proposed back in [1]. I suppose it won't
> be much trouble to move.
On 03/23/19 17:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Just to update this thread --- per the other thread at
> https://postgr.es/m/can-v+g-6jquqeqz55q3toxen6d5ez5uvzl4vr+8ktvjkj31...@mail.gmail.com
> I've now pushed a somewhat-adjusted version of the XML-content fix
> patch. The documentation patch needs some sma
Chapman Flack writes:
> Alvaro has committed two of the patches in this CF entry[1], but the
> remaining two have yet to attract review.
> This message contains only those two, just as before[2] except rebased
> over Alvaro's commits of the others.
Just to update this thread --- per the other thr
Alvaro has committed two of the patches in this CF entry[1], but the
remaining two have yet to attract review.
This message contains only those two, just as before[2] except rebased
over Alvaro's commits of the others.
There are two new changes. The s added in the -docfix patch now
have link t
