Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

2024-04-15 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:56:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Thanks! indri has reported on some branches, and is now green for REL_12_STABLE and REL_13_STABLE. The rest should be OK. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

2024-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 07:42:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Please, if you have the time. > Okay, done that in the 12~16 range then, removing all traces of > xmlParseMemory() including for xml_is_well_formed() in 12~14. That > should calm down indri. Thanks!

Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

2024-04-15 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 07:42:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Please, if you have the time. Okay, done that in the 12~16 range then, removing all traces of xmlParseMemory() including for xml_is_well_formed() in 12~14. That should calm down indri. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

2024-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 07:14:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I could switch the animal to use -Wno-deprecated-declarations in the >> back branches, but I'd rather not. I think the right answer is to >> back-patch Michael's 65c5864d7 (xml2: Replace deprecated routines

Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

2024-04-15 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 07:14:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I could switch the animal to use -Wno-deprecated-declarations in the > back branches, but I'd rather not. I think the right answer is to > back-patch Michael's 65c5864d7 (xml2: Replace deprecated routines with > recommended ones). We

Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

2024-04-15 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2024-04-15 19:14:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I think the right answer is to > back-patch Michael's 65c5864d7 (xml2: Replace deprecated routines with > recommended ones). We speculated about that at the time (see e.g., > 400928b83) but didn't pull the trigger. I think 65c5864d7 has now >

Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

2024-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
I just noticed that my animal indri has been failing in the back branches since I updated its MacPorts packages a few days ago: ccache gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Werror=vla -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wendif-labels