Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 04:07:34AM +, Ideriha, Takeshi wrote: > Sure. I didn't have a strong opinion about it, so it's ok. From what I can see this is waiting input from a native English speaker, so for now I have moved this entry to next CF. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP

RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp] >Subject: Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint > >>>>>>Alternative HINT message would be something like: >>>>>> >>>>>>HINT: In a moment you should be able to rec

Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

>Alternative HINT message would be something like: > >HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the > database and restart your transaction. > >This could make the meaning of the error (transaction aborted) >cleaner and might give a better suggestion to

RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

according to my simple experiment in >>>>> psql the output would become the following: >>>>> >>>>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout >>>>> HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the >>>>&g

Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

ntioned. >> >>> >> >>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in >> >>> psql the output would become the following: >> >>> >> >>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout >> &

Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in > >>> psql the output would become the following: > >>> > >>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout > >>> HINT: In a moment you should be able to

Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

the following: >>>> >>>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout >>>> HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the >>>> database and repeat your command. >>> >>>Alternative HINT message would be

Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

>>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as >>> other cases you mentioned. >>> >>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in >>> psql the output would become the following: >>> >>> FA

RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as >> other cases you mentioned. >> >> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in >> psql the output would become the following: >> >> FATAL: terminating con

Re: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as other cases > you mentioned. > > I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment > in psql the output would become the following: > > FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-trans

RE: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp] >Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 12:18 PM >To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org >Subject: idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint > >idle-in-transaction timeout error closed the session. I think in this case th

idle-in-transaction timeout error does not give a hint

idle-in-transaction timeout error closed the session. I think in this case the error message should give a hint something like other errors (for example ERRCODE_CRASH_SHUTDOWN or ERRCODE_T_R_SERIALIZATION_FAILURE) to ask users to reconnect. Attached patch does that. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii

<    1   2