Maxim Orlov writes:
>> -1. Having to touch all the call sites like this outweighs
>> any claimed advantage: it makes them uglier and it will greatly
>> complicate any back-patching we might have to do in those areas.
> Ok, got it. But what if we change the semantics of these calls to
> xid =
> -1. Having to touch all the call sites like this outweighs
> any claimed advantage: it makes them uglier and it will greatly
> complicate any back-patching we might have to do in those areas.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Ok, got it. But what if we change the semantics of
Maxim Orlov writes:
> I've notice recent activity to convert macros into inline functions. We
> should make TransactionIdRetreat/Advance functions
> Instead of a macro, should we?
-1. Having to touch all the call sites like this outweighs
any claimed advantage: it makes them uglier and it will
Hi!
This patch is inspired by [0] and many others.
I've notice recent activity to convert macros into inline functions. We
should make TransactionIdRetreat/Advance functions
Instead of a macro, should we?
I also think about NormalTransactionIdPrecedes and
NormalTransactionIdFollows, but maybe,
