Bharath Rupireddy writes:
> Merged. PSA v8 patch set.
Pushed, thanks.
regards, tom lane
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 9:50 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:25:33 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy
> wrote in
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:55 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > wrote:
> > PSA v7 patch set.
>
> Thanks. Looks perfect, but (sorry..) in the final checking, I found
> "log
At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:25:33 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy
wrote in
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:55 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote:
> PSA v7 patch set.
Thanks. Looks perfect, but (sorry..) in the final checking, I found
"log archive" in the doc. If you agree to it please merge the
attached (or
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:55 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:02:22 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy
> wrote in
> > Done. PSA v6 patch set.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Specifies the minimum size of past log file segments kept in the
> +Specifies the minimum size of past WAL
At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:02:22 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy
wrote in
> Done. PSA v6 patch set.
Thanks!
-Specifies the minimum size of past log file segments kept in the
+Specifies the minimum size of past WAL files kept in the
-log file by reducing the value of this
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 6:55 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:58:28 -0700, Nathan Bossart
> wrote in
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:43:59PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > > Done. PSA v5 patch set.
> >
> > LGTM. I've marked this as ready-for-committer.
>
> I find the
At Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:58:28 -0700, Nathan Bossart
wrote in
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:43:59PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > Done. PSA v5 patch set.
>
> LGTM. I've marked this as ready-for-committer.
I find the following sentense in config.sgml. "Specifies the minimum
size of past
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:43:59PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Done. PSA v5 patch set.
LGTM. I've marked this as ready-for-committer.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:00 AM Nathan Bossart
wrote:
>
> Overall, these patches look reasonable.
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:24:12PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > record. Because the entire content of data pages is saved in the
> > - log on the first page modification after a
Overall, these patches look reasonable.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:24:12PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> record. Because the entire content of data pages is saved in the
> - log on the first page modification after a checkpoint (assuming
> + WAL record on the first page modification
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:24 AM Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> It's been a few weeks, so I'm marking the commitfest entry as
> waiting-on-author.
Thanks. I'm attaching the updated v4 patches (also subsumed Kyotaro
San's patch at [1]). Please review it further.
[1]
It's been a few weeks, so I'm marking the commitfest entry as
waiting-on-author.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:31:10AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> you should at least save the contents of the cluster's
> pg_wal
> - subdirectory, as it might contain logs which
> + subdirectory, as it might contain WAL files which
> were not archived before the system
At Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:45:56 -0700, Nathan Bossart
wrote in
> At all times, PostgreSQL maintains a
> write ahead log (WAL) in the
> pg_wal/
> - subdirectory of the cluster's data directory. The log records
> - every change made to the database's data files. This log exists
> +
At all times, PostgreSQL maintains a
write ahead log (WAL) in the
pg_wal/
- subdirectory of the cluster's data directory. The log records
- every change made to the database's data files. This log exists
+ subdirectory of the cluster's data directory. The WAL records
+ capture
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 11:41 AM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
>
> Please review the v2 patch set.
Had to rebase. Attaching v3 patch set.
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
v3-0001-Use-WAL-segment-instead-of-log-segment.patch
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 6:50 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:03:07 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy
> wrote in
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like we use "log segment" in various user-facing messages.
> > The term "log" can mean server logs as well. The "WAL segment" suits
> > well here
At Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:03:07 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy
wrote in
> Hi,
>
> It looks like we use "log segment" in various user-facing messages.
> The term "log" can mean server logs as well. The "WAL segment" suits
> well here and it is consistently used across the other user-facing
> messages
Hi,
It looks like we use "log segment" in various user-facing messages.
The term "log" can mean server logs as well. The "WAL segment" suits
well here and it is consistently used across the other user-facing
messages [1].
Here's a small patch attempting to consistently use the "WAL segment".
19 matches
Mail list logo
