On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 18:01, vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 09:59, Thomas Munro wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Tom, Andres, Juan José, Andrew for your feedback. I agree that
> > it's a better "OS harmonisation" outcome if we can choose both ways on
> > both OSes. I will leave the 0003
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 09:59, Thomas Munro wrote:
>
> Thanks Tom, Andres, Juan José, Andrew for your feedback. I agree that
> it's a better "OS harmonisation" outcome if we can choose both ways on
> both OSes. I will leave the 0003 patch aside for now due to lack of
> time, but here's a rebase
Thanks Tom, Andres, Juan José, Andrew for your feedback. I agree that
it's a better "OS harmonisation" outcome if we can choose both ways on
both OSes. I will leave the 0003 patch aside for now due to lack of
time, but here's a rebase of the first two patches. Since this is
really just more
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:03 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
>
> 1. Teach mkdtemp() to make a non-world-accessible directory. This is
> required to be able to make a socket that other processes can't
> connect to, to match the paranoia level used on Unix. This was
> written just by reading
On 2023-01-04 We 07:13, vignesh C wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 18:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-12-01 Th 21:10, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2022-12-01 20:56:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2022-12-01 20:30:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 18:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-12-01 Th 21:10, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2022-12-01 20:56:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Andres Freund writes:
> >>> On 2022-12-01 20:30:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> If we remove that, won't we have a whole lot
On 2022-12-01 Th 21:10, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-12-01 20:56:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund writes:
>>> On 2022-12-01 20:30:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
If we remove that, won't we have a whole lot of code that's not
tested at all on any platform, ie all the
Hi,
On 2022-12-01 20:56:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2022-12-01 20:30:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If we remove that, won't we have a whole lot of code that's not
> >> tested at all on any platform, ie all the TCP-socket code?
>
> > There's some coverage via the
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2022-12-01 20:30:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we remove that, won't we have a whole lot of code that's not
>> tested at all on any platform, ie all the TCP-socket code?
> There's some coverage via the auth and ssl tests. But I agree it's an
> issue. But to me the
Hi,
On 2022-12-01 20:30:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > Commit f5580882 established that all supported computers have AF_UNIX.
> > One of the follow-up consequences that was left unfinished is that we
> > could simplify our test harness code to make it the same on all
> >
Thomas Munro writes:
> Commit f5580882 established that all supported computers have AF_UNIX.
> One of the follow-up consequences that was left unfinished is that we
> could simplify our test harness code to make it the same on all
> platforms. Currently we have hundreds of lines of C and perl
Hi,
Commit f5580882 established that all supported computers have AF_UNIX.
One of the follow-up consequences that was left unfinished is that we
could simplify our test harness code to make it the same on all
platforms. Currently we have hundreds of lines of C and perl to use
secure TCP
12 matches
Mail list logo
