> On 2 Dec 2023, at 17:02, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2023-Nov-30, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Recently, a new --filter option was added to pg_dump. I might be
>> wrong, but the syntax of the help message for this feels off. Is the
>> word 'on' not necessary after 'based'?
>>
On 2023-Nov-30, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Recently, a new --filter option was added to pg_dump. I might be
> wrong, but the syntax of the help message for this feels off. Is the
> word 'on' not necessary after 'based'?
>
> > --filter=FILENAMEinclude or exclude objects
> On 30 Nov 2023, at 02:52, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>
> At Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:20:40 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote in
>> Hello.
>>
>> Recently, a new --filter option was added to pg_dump. I might be
>> wrong, but the syntax of the help message for this feels off. Is the
>> word
At Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:20:40 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> Hello.
>
> Recently, a new --filter option was added to pg_dump. I might be
> wrong, but the syntax of the help message for this feels off. Is the
> word 'on' not necessary after 'based'?
>
> > --filter=FILENAME
Hello.
Recently, a new --filter option was added to pg_dump. I might be
wrong, but the syntax of the help message for this feels off. Is the
word 'on' not necessary after 'based'?
> --filter=FILENAMEinclude or exclude objects and data from dump
> based