On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 02:53:36PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > So I did some research on this, particularly to find out how it was
> > missed in the PG 10 release
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> So I did some research on this, particularly to find out how it was
> missed in the PG 10 release notes. It turns out that
> max_parallel_workers_per_gather has always
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Moving to -hackers;
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:53:10PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:45:15PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > Is it because max_parallel_workers_per_gather now defaults to 2 ?
> > >
Moving to -hackers;
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:53:10PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:45:15PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Is it because max_parallel_workers_per_gather now defaults to 2 ?
> >
> > BTW, I would tentatively expect a change in default to be documented
