On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:00 AM Thomas Munro
wrote:
> So I suppose we should just remove it, with something like 0002. I'm
> a bit uneasy about existing code out there that might be not calling
> CFI. OTOH I suspect that a lot of code copied worker_spi.c and
> installed its own handler.
I agre
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:29 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:37 PM Thomas Munro
> wrote:
> > 0. The default SIGTERM handler for bgworkers is bgworker_die(), which
> > generates a FATAL ereport "terminating background worker \"%s\" due to
> > administrator command", directly in t
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:37 PM Thomas Munro
wrote:
> I still think the current situation is non-ideal. I don't have a
> strong view on whether some or all system-wide processes should say
> hello and goodbye explicitly in the log, but I do think we need a way
> to make that not look like an error
