Andres Freund writes:
> I tried to use -Og many times, but in the end mostly gave up, because it still
> makes debugging harder compared to -O0.
Yeah. My own habit is to build with -O2 normally. If I'm trying to
debug some bit of code and find that I can't follow things adequately
in gdb, I
Hi,
On 2022-06-02 01:09:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > forking: <20220302205058.gj15...@telsasoft.com>: Re: Adding CI to our tree
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:50:58PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >> BTW (regarding the last patch), I just noticed that -Og optimization
Hi,
On 2022-06-02 10:33:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matthias van de Meent writes:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, 07:10 Tom Lane, wrote:
> >> I'm a little dubious about whether -Og is a case we should pay special
> >> attention to?
>
> > The "Developer FAQ" page on the wiki suggests that when you
Hi,
On 2022-06-02 13:24:28 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 09:42:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Today's "warnings" thread suggests to me that these are worth fixing - it
> > seems
> > reasonable to compile postgres 14 on centos7 (as I sometimes have done), and
> >
Matthias van de Meent writes:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, 07:10 Tom Lane, wrote:
>> I'm a little dubious about whether -Og is a case we should pay special
>> attention to?
> The "Developer FAQ" page on the wiki suggests that when you develop
> with gcc that you use CFLAGS="-ggdb -Og -g3
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, 07:10 Tom Lane, wrote:
>
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > forking: <20220302205058.gj15...@telsasoft.com>: Re: Adding CI to our tree
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:50:58PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >> BTW (regarding the last patch), I just noticed that -Og optimization can
>
> On 2 Jun 2022, at 07:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm a little dubious about whether -Og is a case we should pay special
> attention to? Our standard optimization setting for gcc is -O2, and
> once you go away from that there are any number of weird cases that
> may or may not produce warnings.
I
Justin Pryzby writes:
> forking: <20220302205058.gj15...@telsasoft.com>: Re: Adding CI to our tree
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:50:58PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> BTW (regarding the last patch), I just noticed that -Og optimization can
>> cause
>> warnings with gcc-4.8.5-39.el7.x86_64.
I'm
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 09:42:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Today's "warnings" thread suggests to me that these are worth fixing - it
> seems
> reasonable to compile postgres 14 on centos7 (as I sometimes have done), and
> the patch seems even more reasonable when backpatched to older
forking: <20220302205058.gj15...@telsasoft.com>: Re: Adding CI to our tree
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:50:58PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> BTW (regarding the last patch), I just noticed that -Og optimization can cause
> warnings with gcc-4.8.5-39.el7.x86_64.
>
> be-fsstubs.c: In function
10 matches
Mail list logo