On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:39 PM Euler Taveira wrote:
> Em seg, 10 de jun de 2019 às 14:34, Alexander Korotkov
> escreveu:
> >
> > Pushed!
> >
> Alexander, this commit is ok for 11 and so. However, GUC
> strict_word_similarity_threshold does not exist in 9.6 and 10. The
> attached patch revert
Em seg, 10 de jun de 2019 às 14:34, Alexander Korotkov
escreveu:
>
> Pushed!
>
Alexander, this commit is ok for 11 and so. However, GUC
strict_word_similarity_threshold does not exist in 9.6 and 10. The
attached patch revert this part. It should apply cleanly in 9.6 and
10.
--
Euler Taveira
On 6/11/19 2:33 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 8:17 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:02 PM Ian Barwick wrote:
On 6/7/19 9:00 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Or is that not worth
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 8:17 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:02 PM Ian Barwick
> wrote:
> > On 6/7/19 9:00 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Or is that not worth bothering except on HEAD? Thoughts?
>
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:02 PM Ian Barwick wrote:
> On 6/7/19 9:00 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Or is that not worth bothering except on HEAD? Thoughts?
>
> Personally I don't think it's that critical, but not bothered
On 6/7/19 9:00 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
BTW while looking GUC variables defined in trgm_op.c the operators in
each short description seems not correct; there is an extra percent
sign. Should we also fix them?
Both of you are
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> BTW while looking GUC variables defined in trgm_op.c the operators in
> each short description seems not correct; there is an extra percent
> sign. Should we also fix them?
Both of you are right here, and the addition
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 10:19 PM Ian Barwick wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Commit be8a7a68662 added custom GUC
> "pg_trgm.strict_word_similarity_threshold",
> but omitted to document this in the section "GUC Parameters";
Indeed.
BTW while looking GUC variables defined in trgm_op.c the operators in
each
Hi
Commit be8a7a68662 added custom GUC "pg_trgm.strict_word_similarity_threshold",
but omitted to document this in the section "GUC Parameters"; proposed patch
attached.
I suggest backpatching to Pg11, where it was introduced.
Regards
Ian Barwick
--
Ian Barwick
