On 11/23/2017 07:16 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/22/17 22:58, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Joe Conway writes:
>>> I just noticed that has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo about
>>> "WITH GRANT OPTION". Any objections to the attached going back to all
>
On 11/22/17 22:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway writes:
>> I just noticed that has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo about
>> "WITH GRANT OPTION". Any objections to the attached going back to all
>> supported versions?
>
> That looks odd. Patch cert
Joe Conway writes:
> I just noticed that has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo about
> "WITH GRANT OPTION". Any objections to the attached going back to all
> supported versions?
That looks odd. Patch certainly makes this case consistent with the
rest of acl.c, but
I just noticed that has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo about
"WITH GRANT OPTION". Any objections to the attached going back to all
supported versions?
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Sour