Re: headerscheck ccache support

2025-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2025-11-21 13:14:18 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2025-Nov-21, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > ># Verify headerscheck / cpluspluscheck succeed > ># > > - # - Don't use ccache, the files are uncacheable, polluting ccache's > > - # cache > > So how bad is the effect of the cache po

Re: headerscheck ccache support

2025-11-21 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2025-11-21 11:48:10 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Currently, headerscheck and cpluspluscheck are very slow, and they defeat > use of ccache. I have fixed that, and now they are much faster. :-) > > The problem was (I think) that the test files are created in a > randomly-named director

Re: headerscheck ccache support

2025-11-21 Thread Álvaro Herrera
On 2025-Nov-21, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Currently, headerscheck and cpluspluscheck are very slow, and they defeat > use of ccache. I have fixed that, and now they are much faster. :-) Yeah, I had noticed this too. Thanks for fixing it. > My solution is to create the test files in the build d

headerscheck ccache support

2025-11-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Nov 2025 10:53:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] headerscheck ccache support --- .cirrus.tasks.yml| 5 ++--- src/tools/pginclude/headerscheck | 11 --- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/.cirrus.tasks.yml b/.cirrus.tasks.yml index 2fe9671f3dc..038