On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:49 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
...
>
> Another thing I noticed is that we could change all (or most of) the
> tags to , but it's also a much larger
> change. Having (some of?) these variable names be links would be useful
> IMO.
>
+1 to do this.
IMO these should all be c
On 2024-Jan-16, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. The wording looks good to me. However, I have
> some comments on the placement of the note:
>
> 1. How about bundling this in a or ?
Yeah, I considered this too, but I discarded the idea because my
impression of and was that t
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 9:08 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Pursuant to a comment I made a few months ago[1], I propose the attached
> changes to replication slots documentation. In essence, I want to
> explain that replication slots are good, and the max_size GUC, before
> moving on to explain tha
Pursuant to a comment I made a few months ago[1], I propose the attached
changes to replication slots documentation. In essence, I want to
explain that replication slots are good, and the max_size GUC, before
moving on to explain that the other methods are worse.
Thanks
[1] https://postgr.es/m/2
