On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:52 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> Some of the internals does seem bleed through. Do you want to work on a patch
> for a suggestion on an improvement? Maybe it could be possible to improve the
> wording by incorporating constraint_type in some way?
>
I have changed thi
> On 17 Nov 2025, at 05:06, jian he wrote:
> In the example above , the primary error message "unique
> constraint..." seems confusing.
Some of the internals does seem bleed through. Do you want to work on a patch
for a suggestion on an improvement? Maybe it could be possible to improve the
wo
hi.
while working on virtual generated column as partition key, I found below
errmsg the constraint type is hardcoded.
if (!found)
{
Form_pg_attribute att;
att = TupleDescAttr(RelationGetDescr(rel),
key->p
