> On 30 Mar 2023, at 08:24, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>
> The pg_basebackup code has WalSegSz as uint32, whereas the rest of the code
> has it as int. This seems confusing, and using the extra range wouldn't
> actually work. This was in the original commit (fc49e24fa6), but I suppose
> it w
b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:19:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pg_basebackup: Correct type of WalSegSz
The pg_basebackup code had WalSegSz as uint32, whereas the rest of the
code has it as int. This seems confusing, and using the extra range
wouldn'
