Philip Warner writes:
> Please find attached a patch for pg_dump to honour the setting of
> `run_as_owner`; I believe that effective pre-16 behavious was to run as
> owner, so I have set the flag to ‘t’ for pre-16 versions. Please let me know
> if you would prefer the opposite.
I think that's
...patch actually attached this time...
> > I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for
> > a subscription.
> >
> > Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if
> > anyone else is working on it.
>
> Yes, it certainly should. That is an
> > I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for
> > a subscription.
> >
> > Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if
> > anyone else is working on it.
>
> Yes, it certainly should. That is an omission in 482675987b.
> Go ahead and wr
On Fri, 2023-10-27 at 18:05 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
> I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for a
> subscription.
>
> Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if anyone
> else is working on it.
Yes, it certainly should. That is an
dumping the run_as_owner setting from version 16?
Hi,
I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for a
subscription.
Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if anyone
else is working on it.
Sent from Mail for Windows
Hi,
I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for a
subscription.
Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if anyone
else is working on it.
Sent from Mail for Windows
