On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 11:34:07AM +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Christian Ullrich wrote:
> >* Noah Misch wrote:
> >>On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>Oh, OK. In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
> >>>more modern builds into the buildfarm
* Christian Ullrich wrote:
* Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Oh, OK. In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
more modern builds into the buildfarm while we're at it.
Yep. Among machines already in the buildfarm, the one
On 01/11/2018 12:08 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 11:46:08AM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 12:36:13PM +, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>>> * Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh, OK. In that case, we
* From: Noah Misch [mailto:n...@leadboat.com]
> > > Ready to go, waiting for animal assignment. For now, I can
> confirm that it works, that is, the buildfarm --test run is
> successful.
> Did the animal assignment come through? I don't see such an animal
> reporting.
No, not yet. Sorry, I
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 11:46:08AM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 12:36:13PM +, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> > * Noah Misch wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Oh, OK. In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
> > >>
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 12:36:13PM +, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Oh, OK. In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
> >> more modern builds into the buildfarm while we're at it.
> >
> >
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:34:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't really have an opinion about the relative merits of these changes,
> >> but why do anything? The existing solution has the
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:14:41PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> 1. If $Config{gccversion} is nonempty, add _USE_32BIT_TIME_T. This will do
>the wrong thing if MinGW changes its default to match modern MSVC. It will
>do the wrong thing for a Perl built with "gcc
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:15:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> ... it's now looking to me like we should do the above with X = 5.13.4.
>>> That won't be a perfect solution, but it's
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:34:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:15:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... it's now looking to me like we should do the above with X = 5.13.4.
> >> That won't be a perfect solution, but it's about the
10 matches
Mail list logo