Etsuro Fujita writes:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:49 PM Laurenz Albe wrote:
>> On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 02:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I am not quite clear on how broken an installation needs to be to
>>> reject "UTC" as a time zone setting, except that the breakage cannot
>>> be subtle. However,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:49 PM Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 02:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > ERROR: invalid value for parameter "TimeZone": "UTC"
> >
> > I am not quite clear on how broken an installation needs to be to
> > reject "UTC" as a time zone setting, except that the
> On 4 Apr 2024, at 08:19, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Over at [1] we have a complaint of postgres_fdw failing with
> a remote-server error
>
>> ERROR: invalid value for parameter "TimeZone": "UTC"
>
> I am not quite clear on how broken an installation needs to be to
> reject "UTC" as a time zone
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 02:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > ERROR: invalid value for parameter "TimeZone": "UTC"
>
> I am not quite clear on how broken an installation needs to be to
> reject "UTC" as a time zone setting, except that the breakage cannot
> be subtle. However, I notice that our code
Over at [1] we have a complaint of postgres_fdw failing with
a remote-server error
> ERROR: invalid value for parameter "TimeZone": "UTC"
I am not quite clear on how broken an installation needs to be to
reject "UTC" as a time zone setting, except that the breakage cannot
be subtle. However, I
