On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 1:00 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yeah, you are probably right. I didn't see that. You should apply it
> since it is your patch, thanks.
Okay, so barring any objection, I will commit the attached patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
v1-0001-doc-Update-pg_upgrade-documentatio
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 12:41:28PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 8:56 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:52:15PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 9:32 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:02:53PM +0800, Ra
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 8:56 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:52:15PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 9:32 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:02:53PM +0800, Rambabu V wrote:
> > > > Hi Team,
> > > >
> > > > seems stats are not ret
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:52:15PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 9:32 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:02:53PM +0800, Rambabu V wrote:
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > seems stats are not retained after upgrade. Below are the artifacts , is
> > > it
> > > ex
On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 01:03:30PM +0800, Rambabu V wrote:
> Thanks all for the proactive response and clarification.
>
> people will be confused by seeing the release notes, it should be a little bit
> clear or need to update.
Yes, the release notes are clear, but the non-release docs are not.
Thanks all for the proactive response and clarification.
people will be confused by seeing the release notes, it should be a little
bit clear or need to update.
i have one more question :
with every version of package installation , PG 17 version is getting by
default installed, is it a hard dep
On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 5:22 AM Robert Treat wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 9:32 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:02:53PM +0800, Rambabu V wrote:
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > seems stats are not retained after upgrade. Below are the artifacts , is
> > > it
> > > expected?
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 9:32 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:02:53PM +0800, Rambabu V wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > seems stats are not retained after upgrade. Below are the artifacts , is it
> > expected? as per the release notes statistics should be retained.
>
> Uh, it is the
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 9:32 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, it is the _optimizer_ statistics that are preserved by pg_upgrade,
>
Specifically, check out the pg_stats view. Try this on your new cluster:
select count(distinct tablename) from pg_stats where tablename !~
'pg_|sql_';
Cheers,
Greg
-
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:02:53PM +0800, Rambabu V wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> seems stats are not retained after upgrade. Below are the artifacts , is it
> expected? as per the release notes statistics should be retained.
Uh, it is the _optimizer_ statistics that are preserved by pg_upgrade,
not the
Hi Team,
seems stats are not retained after upgrade. Below are the artifacts , is it
expected? as per the release notes statistics should be retained.
before upgrade:
postgres=# select * from pg_stat_user_tables;
-[ RECORD 1 ]---+--
relid | 16384
11 matches
Mail list logo