On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:48:29PM +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
> If we decide to fix this, we should probably revise and back-patch the whole
> paragraph where it appears as it seems to mix up scanning target cluster
> WALs and applying source cluster WALs. A small patch is attached for your
>
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 16:59, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> He didn't
> add a mailing list reference, but this is easy to find at
> https://postgr.es/m/20160720180706.gf24...@momjian.us
> I lean towards the view that he was using the literal program name as a
> verb, rather than trying to decline a verb
On 2019-Aug-07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
> > To me this sounds like a classic non-English-native-speaker-mistake. But
> > it seems at least the one in the docs come from Bruce, who definitely is...
>
> He might've just been committing somebody else's words without having
>
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
>> The word "rewinded" appears in our manual and in a comment. That
>> sounds strange to my ears. Isn't it a mistake?
Certainly.
> To me this sounds like a classic non-English-native-speaker-mistake. But
> it
On 08/07/19 04:48, Thomas Munro wrote:
> as "poetic" and "rare", and then says it was used by one specific
> Victorian poet. Perhaps I'll send them a pull request: it's now G. M.
> Hopkins and PostgreSQL?
It does seem counter, original, spare, strange.
Regards,
-Chap
On 8/7/19 12:00 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:53:45AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
To me this sounds like a classic non-English-native-speaker-mistake. But
it seems at least the one in the docs come from Bruce, who definitely is...
So perhaps it's intentional to refer
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:53:45AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> To me this sounds like a classic non-English-native-speaker-mistake. But
> it seems at least the one in the docs come from Bruce, who definitely is...
> So perhaps it's intentional to refer to "what pg_rewind does", and not
>
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The word "rewinded" appears in our manual and in a comment. That
> sounds strange to my ears. Isn't it a mistake? Oxford lists the form
> as "poetic" and "rare", and then says it was used by one specific
> Victorian poet.
Hello,
The word "rewinded" appears in our manual and in a comment. That
sounds strange to my ears. Isn't it a mistake? Oxford lists the form
as "poetic" and "rare", and then says it was used by one specific
Victorian poet. Perhaps I'll send them a pull request: it's now G. M.
Hopkins and
