Michael,
* Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 04:14:15PM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 06:02:51PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >>> I'm confused. Isn't the point of that script exactly to c
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:20:15AM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Attached is a patch with more comments about the intents of the test
>>> suite, and the separate issue
Michael,
* Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:20:15AM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Attached is a patch with more comments about the intents of the test
> > suite, and the separate issue pointed out by Tom fixed. It seems to me
> > that actually checking
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:20:15AM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is a patch with more comments about the intents of the test
> suite, and the separate issue pointed out by Tom fixed. It seems to me
> that actually checking the contents of pg_init_privs would improve the
> reason why the
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 04:14:15PM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 06:02:51PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>>> I'm confused. Isn't the point of that script exactly to create a modified
>>> extension for testing pg_dump w
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 06:02:51PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Michael Paquier writes:
>>> While hacking another patch, I have noticed that triggerring multiple
>>> times in a row installcheck on test_pg_dump results in a failure because
>>> it is missin
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > While hacking another patch, I have noticed that triggerring multiple
> > times in a row installcheck on test_pg_dump results in a failure because
> > it is missing clean up actions on the role regress_dump_test_role.
Michael Paquier writes:
> While hacking another patch, I have noticed that triggerring multiple
> times in a row installcheck on test_pg_dump results in a failure because
> it is missing clean up actions on the role regress_dump_test_role.
> Roles are shared objects, so I think that we ought to no
Hi Stephen,
While hacking another patch, I have noticed that triggerring multiple
times in a row installcheck on test_pg_dump results in a failure because
it is missing clean up actions on the role regress_dump_test_role.
Roles are shared objects, so I think that we ought to not let traces of
it w
