On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:47 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:26:04AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:33:40AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:26 PM Justin Pryzb
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:26:04AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:33:40AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:26 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:43:18PM +053
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:33:40AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:26 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:43:18PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 AM Michael Paq
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:33:40AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:26 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:43:18PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 AM Michael Paquier
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:47
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:26 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:43:18PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:47:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > Your changes look fine to me on the firs
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:43:18PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:47:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > Your changes look fine to me on the first read. I will push this to
> > > HEAD unless there are any obje
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:47:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Your changes look fine to me on the first read. I will push this to
> > HEAD unless there are any objections. If we want them in
> > back-branches, we might want to probab
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:47:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Your changes look fine to me on the first read. I will push this to
> HEAD unless there are any objections. If we want them in
> back-branches, we might want to probably segregate the changes based
> on the branch until those apply.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:44 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> I sent earlier version of this a few times last year along with bunch of other
> doc patches but it was never picked up. So maybe I'll try send one at a time
> in more digestible chunks.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/201904270
I sent earlier version of this a few times last year along with bunch of other
doc patches but it was never picked up. So maybe I'll try send one at a time
in more digestible chunks.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20190427025647.GD3925%40telsasoft.com#e1731c33455145eadc1158042cc411f9
10 matches
Mail list logo