pá 1. 1. 2021 v 11:16 odesílatel Bharath Rupireddy
napsal:
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 6:55 AM Josef Šimánek wrote:
> > finally I had some time to revisit patch and all comments from
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFp7QwqMGEi4OyyaLEK9DR0%2BE%2BoK3UtA4bEjDVCa4bNkwUY2PQ%40mail.gmail.com
Hi
only rebase
Regards
Pavel
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/prepare.c b/src/backend/commands/prepare.c
index 89087a7be3..b1d2f1af37 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/prepare.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/prepare.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ ExecuteQuery(ParseState *pstate,
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 6:55 AM Josef Šimánek wrote:
> finally I had some time to revisit patch and all comments from
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFp7QwqMGEi4OyyaLEK9DR0%2BE%2BoK3UtA4bEjDVCa4bNkwUY2PQ%40mail.gmail.com
> and I have prepared simple version of COPY command progress
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 8:29 AM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
> Right. I meant the "next use" as the select attempt on a foreign table
> with that foreign server. If no select query is run, then at the end
> of the current txn that connection gets closed. Yes internally such
> connection gets closed
> 31 дек. 2020 г., в 00:37, Paul Martinez написал(а):
>
> In Google Cloud SQL we create a role for customers, cloudsqlsuperuser,
> which, confusingly, is not a SUPERUSER, but does have some extra
> permissions. We've modified a lot of "if (!superuser())" checks to
> "if (!superuser() &&
Hi
fresh rebase
Regards
Pavel
schema-variables-20210101.patch.gz
Description: application/gzip
Hi,
In an effort to speed up bulk data loading/transforming I noticed that
considerable time is spent in the relation extension lock. I know there
are already many other efforts to increase the chances of using bulk
loading [1], [2], [3], [4], efforts to make loading more parallel [5],
and
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 7:15 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> * I tweaked comments a bit to address your comments.
I forgot to update some comments. :-( Attached is a new version of
the patch updating comments further. I did a bit of cleanup for the
postgres_fdw part as well.
Best regards,
Etsuro
Hi
rebase
Regards
Pavel
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml
index 11246aa653..89a07678ee 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml
@@ -4606,6 +4606,99 @@ CREATE EVENT TRIGGER snitch ON ddl_command_start EXECUTE FUNCTION snitch();
Hi,
Happy new year to all!
The January Commitfest for PG14 is now in progress! I'm happy to
volunteer to manage it.
Current state for the Commitfest is:
Needs review: 188
Waiting on Author: 28
Ready for Committer: 22
Committed: 19
Withdrawn: 3
Total: 260
The number of patches waiting on
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 9:00 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 08:24:06PM +0100, David Fetter wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:57:58AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>> I have looked at the patch of this thread, and I doubt that it is a
> >>> good
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 03:10:29PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 08:22:07PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > So, I am learning this cfbot thing. Seems I need -M100% to disable
> > rename detection for diffs to work with cfbot --- makes sense.
>
> A good way to make sure
Isaac Morland writes:
> Is it safe and valid to reset to default permissions by doing
> UPDATE pg_namespace/pg_class/pg_type/pg_proc
> SET nspacl/relacl/typacl/proacl = NULL WHERE ... to accomplish this?
Not terribly; the main objection is you'd fail to update pg_shdepend.
> And what do people
Hi,
I noticed -k/--data-checksums is currently in the less commonly used
options part of the initdb --help output:
|Less commonly used options:
| -d, --debug generate lots of debugging output
| -k, --data-checksums use data page checksums
I think enough people use data
On Fri, 1 Jan 2021 at 11:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Isaac Morland writes:
> > Is it safe and valid to reset to default permissions by doing
> > UPDATE pg_namespace/pg_class/pg_type/pg_proc
> > SET nspacl/relacl/typacl/proacl = NULL WHERE ... to accomplish this?
>
> Not terribly; the main objection
Krasiyan:
Happy New Year.
For WinGetFuncArgInPartition():
+ if (target > 0)
+ step = 1;
+ else if (target < 0)
+ step = -1;
+ else
+ step = 0;
When would the last else statement execute ? Since the above code is
for
Hi, Luc:
Happy New Year.
Looking at BufferAllocExtend()
in v1-0002-WIP-buffer-alloc-specialized-for-relation-extensi.patch. it
seems there is duplicate code with the existing BufferAlloc().
It would be good if some refactoring is done by extracting common code into
a helper function.
Thanks
On
Hi, Pavel:
Happy New Year.
+ command with clause WINDOW. The specific feature of
+ this functions is a possibility to two special storages with
this functions -> this function
possibility to two special storages: there is no verb.
'store with stored one value': store is repeated.
+ *
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:47:23AM +0900, torikoshia wrote:
> So I'm now thinking about adding a new column in pg_locks which
> keeps the time at which locks started waiting.
>
> Attached a patch.
This is failing make check-world, would you send an updated patch ?
I added you as an author so it
Hi Noah!
I've found this thread in CF looking for something to review.
> 9 нояб. 2020 г., в 09:53, Noah Misch написал(а):
>
> Rebased both patches, necessitated by commit c732c3f (a repair of commit
> dee663f). As I mentioned on another branch of the thread, I'd be content if
> someone
Hi Stephen, Bruce, Fabien
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 at 17:05, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 11:11:11AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > > > I am not sure what else I can add to this discussion. Having something
> > > >
It looks like macOS doesn't have pthread barriers (via cfbot 2021, now
with more operating systems):
Indeed:-(
I'll look into that.
--
Fabien.
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 11:05:29PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> I've found this thread in CF looking for something to review.
Thanks for taking a look.
> > 9 нояб. 2020 г., в 09:53, Noah Misch написал(а):
> >
> > Rebased both patches, necessitated by commit c732c3f (a repair of commit
> >
Hi, Bharath:
Happy new year.
+ appendStringInfo(, "(%s, %s)", server->servername,
+entry->invalidated ? "false" : "true");
Is it better to use 'invalidated' than 'false' in the string ?
For the first if block of postgres_fdw_disconnect():
+* Check if the
Hi, it looks like cfbot.cputube.org didn't recognize and can't apply a
patch, so I resend it now with a different format, no other changes.
На ср, 30.12.2020 г. в 22:16 ч. Krasiyan Andreev
написа:
> It works - now it compiles clean and all checks are passed, thank you. I
> will continue with
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 7:01 AM Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Attached is the latest patch against HEAD - basically fixes a few typos.
Hi Greg,
It looks like there is a collation dependency here that causes the
test to fail on some systems:
=== ./src/test/regress/regression.diffs ===
diff -U3
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 7:37 PM Luc Vlaming wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to speed up bulk data loading/transforming I noticed that
> considerable time is spent in the relation extension lock.
>
We already do extend the relation in bulk when there is a contention
on relation extension lock via
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> I think enough people use data checksums these days that it warrants to
> be moved into the "normal part", like in the attached.
+1. Let's see first what others think about this change.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 1:16 PM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> Attached is an updated version of the patch series, rebased on current
> master, and results for benchmark comparing the various bloom variants.
Perhaps src/include/utils/inet.h needs to include ,
because FreeBSD says:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 03:06:13PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Thanks. I had to learn how to squash my commits into a new branch and
> then generate a format-patch on that:
>
> https://bugsdb.com/_en/debug/8b648ec395b86be32efa9629cb006d74
>
> I wanted to see how the cfbot liked my
Thanks for taking a look at the patches.
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 9:35 PM Zhihong Yu wrote:
> Happy new year.
>
> + appendStringInfo(, "(%s, %s)", server->servername,
> +entry->invalidated ? "false" : "true");
>
> Is it better to use 'invalidated' than 'false' in the
> 2 янв. 2021 г., в 01:35, Noah Misch написал(а):
> There's no
> other connection to this thread, and one can review patches on this thread
> without studying commit c732c3f.
OK, thanks!
Do I understand correctly that this is bugfix that needs to be back-patched?
Thus we should not refactor
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 10:53 AM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look at the patches.
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 9:35 PM Zhihong Yu wrote:
> > Happy new year.
> >
> > + appendStringInfo(, "(%s, %s)", server->servername,
> > +entry->invalidated ?
33 matches
Mail list logo
