Re: post-freeze damage control

> > > Yeah, that's an excellent practive, but is why I'm less worried for > > this feature. The docs at [1] caution about "not to remove earlier > > backups if they might be needed when restoring later incremental > > backups". Like Alvaro said, should we insist a bit more about the WAL > >

Re: Key management with tests

Thanks Stephen, Bruce and Masahiko, > > discussions so far and the point behind the design so that everyone > > can understand why this feature is designed in that way. To do that, > > it might be a good start to sort the wiki page since it has data > > encryption part, KMS, and ToDo mixed. > >

Re: Key management with tests

Hello, > > I don't think it makes sense to think about committing this to v14. I > > believe it only makes sense if we have a TDE patch that is relatively > > close to committable that can be used with it. I also don't think that > > this patch is in good enough shape to commit yet in terms of

Re: Key management with tests

I met with Bruce and Stephen this afternoon to discuss the feedback we received so far (prior to Robert's note which I haven't fully digested yet) on this patch. Here is what we plan to do: 1) Bruce is going to gather all the details from the Wiki and build a README for the TDE Key Management

Re: Key management with tests

> > I have to admit I was kind of baffled that the wiki page wasn't > > sufficient, because it is one of the longest Postgres feature > > explanations I have seen, but I now think the missing part is tying > > the wiki contents to the code implementation. If that is it, please > > confirm. If it

Re: Key management with tests

> > > I think that's not at all acceptable. I don't mind hashing out details > > > on calls / off-list, but the design needs to be public, documented, and > > > reviewable. And if it's something the community can't understand, then > > > it can't get in. We're going to have to maintain this going

Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:02:20PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Simon, you have three committers in this thread suggesting this patch be >> reverted. Are you just going to barrel ahead with the fixes without >>