Re: "repliation" as database name

2019-01-28 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
At Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:30:57 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote in <20190128.173057.41178374.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > At Wed, 26 Dec 2018 12:59:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote in > <32289.1545847...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > > Hm, I agree that the para doesn't read very well now,

Re: "repliation" as database name

2019-01-28 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
At Wed, 26 Dec 2018 12:59:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote in <32289.1545847...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Kyotaro HORIGUCHI writes: > > I found that in the documentation thanks to a notification > > off-list. And after some reconfirmation, what I want to fix is > > only a few lines of comment in

Re: "repliation" as database name

2018-12-26 Thread Tom Lane
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI writes: > I found that in the documentation thanks to a notification > off-list. And after some reconfirmation, what I want to fix is > only a few lines of comment in pg_hba.conf.sample. > -# database name, or a comma-separated list thereof. The "all" > -# keyword does not

"repliation" as database name

2018-12-18 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Hello. We can create a database named "replication". $ createdb replication A pg_hba.conf entry with DATABASE="all" is described as 'does not match "replication"' in the comment there, but actually it matches and we can connect to the database "replication". (Documentation doesn't mention the