Hello, sorry for my late reply.
At Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:56:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote in
<26017.1515614...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> I think that there might be a much simpler solution to this, which
> is to just remove make_inh_translation_list's tests of attinhcount,
> as per attached. Those are really p
I wrote:
> I think that there might be a much simpler solution to this, which
> is to just remove make_inh_translation_list's tests of attinhcount,
> as per attached.
I went ahead and pushed that, with an isolation test based on the
one Horiguchi-san submitted but covering a few related cases.
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI writes:
> [ 0002-Lock-parent-on-ALTER-TABLE-NO-INHERIT.patch ]
I don't especially like any of the patches proposed on this thread.
The one with rechecking inheritance seems expensive, duplicative,
and complicated. The approach of taking a lock on the parent will
create deadlock
Hello,
At Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:04:01 +0900, Michael Paquier
wrote in
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> wrote:
> >> By the way, I will take a look at your patch when I come back from the
> >> vacation. Meanwhile, I noticed that it needs another rebase after
> >> 0a480502b09
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote:
>> By the way, I will take a look at your patch when I come back from the
>> vacation. Meanwhile, I noticed that it needs another rebase after
>> 0a480502b092 [1].
Moved to CF 2018-01.
--
Michael
