On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:25:00PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On August 30, 2018 1:24:12 PM PDT, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:18:59PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Could you check if both of the proposed attempts at fixing the issue
> >> also solves your problem?
> >
>
Justin Pryzby writes:
> Just curious, is there really any difficulty in reproducing this?
Once you have the right test case, it's not hard. But it took us two
months to find one ...
regards, tom lane
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:35:51AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> As far as we can tell, that bug is a dozen years old, so it's not clear
> >> why you find that you can reproduce it only in 10.5. But there might
Justin Pryzby writes:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:35:51AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As far as we can tell, that bug is a dozen years old, so it's not clear
>> why you find that you can reproduce it only in 10.5. But there might be
>> some subtle timing change accounting for that.
> It seems to
Hi,
On 2018-08-30 15:00:28 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:35:51AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > This looks suspiciously like the issue under discussion in
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12259.1532117714%40sss.pgh.pa.us
> >
> > As far as we can tell, that
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:35:51AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > I've seen this message now a handful of times recently. It seems to happen
> > overnight, during a maintenance job which reindex things, including system
> > catalog indices.
> > It's easy to reproduce error
Justin Pryzby writes:
> I've seen this message now a handful of times recently. It seems to happen
> overnight, during a maintenance job which reindex things, including system
> catalog indices.
> It's easy to reproduce error under 10.5, but not under 10.3 nor 10.4.
> while :; do for a in
I've seen this message now a handful of times recently. It seems to happen
overnight, during a maintenance job which reindex things, including system
catalog indices.
It's easy to reproduce error under 10.5, but not under 10.3 nor 10.4.
while :; do for a in pg_class_oid_index
