On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 23:24, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
> Here's another attempt. For the rewrite case it kept the logic of the
> previous patch to clear all the missing attributes, but if we're not
> rewriting we reconstruct the missing value according to the new type
> settings.
>
Looks good to me.
On 1/8/19 7:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 1/8/19 4:48 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 19:34, Andrew Dunstan
>> wrote:
>>> Here's a patch that I think cures the problem.
>>>
>> Hmm, that doesn't quite work because the table might not actually be
>> rewritten as a result of
On 1/8/19 4:48 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 19:34, Andrew Dunstan
> wrote:
>> Here's a patch that I think cures the problem.
>>
> Hmm, that doesn't quite work because the table might not actually be
> rewritten as a result of the type change. For example:
>
> DROP TABLE IF
