On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 02:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> But +1 for just dropping them.
Thanks. I just pushed the patch to drop them all.
David
Justin Pryzby writes:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:14:35PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> Does anyone think we should keep these?
> I don't know if I'd support removing the notes, but I agree that they
> don't need to take up anywhere near as much space as they do (especially
> since the note is
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:14:35PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> I was just looking at the vacuumdb docs and noticed that I had
> neglected to follow the tradition of adding a note to mention which
> version we added the new option in when I committed the
> --buffer-usage-limit patch.
>
> There
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:14:35PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> There are 3 notes there that read "This option is only available for
> servers running PostgreSQL 9.6 and later.". Since 9.6 is a few years
> out of support, can we get rid of these 3?
+1
> Or better yet, can we just delete them
I was just looking at the vacuumdb docs and noticed that I had
neglected to follow the tradition of adding a note to mention which
version we added the new option in when I committed the
--buffer-usage-limit patch.
There are 3 notes there that read "This option is only available for
servers
