On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:41:29PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:55 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Thoughts?
>
> The patch as proposed seems fine. Marking RfC.
Thanks. I'll look again at that once v18 opens up for business.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:55 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thoughts?
The patch as proposed seems fine. Marking RfC.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:02:45AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I sent a list of user-facing elogs here, a few times.
> ZDclRM/jate66...@telsasoft.com
>
> And if someone had expressed an interest, I might have sent a longer
> list.
Thanks. I'll take a look at what you have there. Nothing
I sent a list of user-facing elogs here, a few times.
ZDclRM/jate66...@telsasoft.com
And if someone had expressed an interest, I might have sent a longer
list.
Hi all,
While analyzing the use of internal error codes in the code base, I've
some problems, and that's a mixed bag of:
- Incorrect uses, for errors that can be triggered by users with
vallid cases.
- Expected error cases, wanted by the tests like corruption cases or
just to keep some code
