Hello, Magnus.
You wrote:
MH> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Pavel Golub wrote:
MH> Hello, Tom.
MH> You wrote:
TL>> Geoff Winkless writes:
>>> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
>>> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" a
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Pavel Golub wrote:
> Hello, Tom.
>
> You wrote:
>
> TL> Geoff Winkless writes:
> >> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I
> do
> >> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums"
> autofilter
> >> in gmail) and h
Hello, Tom.
You wrote:
TL> Geoff Winkless writes:
>> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
>> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
>> in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to make such a
>> machine-read
Hello, Geoff.
You wrote:
GW> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for
GW> me: I do not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the
GW> "Forums" autofilter in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there
GW> is no way to make such a machine-readable header visible in
Geoff Winkless writes:
> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
> in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to make such a
> machine-readable header visible in gmail.
I'
> On 13 Nov 2017, at 17:45, Geoff Winkless wrote:
>
> On 13 November 2017 at 17:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Geoff Winkless wrote:
>>> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
>>> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
>>> i
On 13 November 2017 at 17:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Geoff Winkless wrote:
>> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
>> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
>> in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to mak
Geoff Winkless wrote:
> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
> in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to make such a
> machine-readable header visible in gmail.
Mayb
Greetings,
* Geoff Winkless (pgsqlad...@geoff.dj) wrote:
> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
> in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to make such a
> machine-rea
Hi,
I also find it very useful to be able to identify the list by the subject.
The way to address this is, as Geoff mentions, to NOT include subject in
your DKIM signature.
Regards,
Ken
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:41:59PM +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header wi
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
> not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
> in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to make such a
> machine-read
The removal of the [HACKERS] (etc) header will be frustrating for me: I do
not sort mailing lists into folders (I simply scan the "Forums" autofilter
in gmail) and have no wish to do so, and there is no way to make such a
machine-readable header visible in gmail.
Perhaps those users who wish to us
Hi,
> Am 13.11.2017 um 16:50 schrieb Dave Page :
>
> It's worth noting though that it is tied into both our existing community
> user account system and our underlying infrastructure. Don't expect a nice
> shiny RPM or DEB that you can just install and run - it would almost
> certainly take a
Dave,
* Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Alvar C.H. Freude (a...@alvar-freude.de) wrote:
> > > I’m using Sympa for my own mailing lists and are always interested in
> > other alternatives then mailman.
> >
> > Yes, it's actually on
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Alvar C.H. Freude (a...@alvar-freude.de) wrote:
> > > Am 13.11.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Stephen Frost :
> > >
> > > The changes which we expect to be most significant to users can be
> found
> > > on the wiki here: https://wiki
Greetings,
* Alvar C.H. Freude (a...@alvar-freude.de) wrote:
> > Am 13.11.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Stephen Frost :
> >
> > The changes which we expect to be most significant to users can be found
> > on the wiki here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGLister_Announce the
> > current version of whic
Hi,
> Am 13.11.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Stephen Frost :
>
> The changes which we expect to be most significant to users can be found
> on the wiki here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGLister_Announce the
> current version of which is also included below.
Sorry, this is a little bit off topic, b
Greetings,
* Tatsuo Ishii (is...@sraoss.co.jp) wrote:
> > This list has now been migrated to new mailing list software known as
> > 'PGLister'. This migration will impact all users of this mailing list
> > in one way or another.
> >
> > If you would like to unsubscribe from this mailing list, pl
From: Stephen Frost
Subject: Migration to PGLister - After
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:14:56 -0500
Message-ID: <20171113131456.gf4...@tamriel.snowman.net>
> Greetings!
>
> This list has now been migrated to new mailing list software known as
> 'PGLister'. This migrat
Greetings!
This list has now been migrated to new mailing list software known as
'PGLister'. This migration will impact all users of this mailing list
in one way or another.
If you would like to unsubscribe from this mailing list, please click on
'Show Original' or 'Show Headers' in your client
20 matches
Mail list logo
