On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 07:28:42PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> > Yes, but piecemeal encryption seems like a bad idea to me.
>
> What do you mean by "piecemeal encryption"? Is it not-whole database
> encryption such as per-table or
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 06:22:46PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
>> wrote:
>> > From: Nico Williams [mailto:n...@cryptonector.com]
>> >
>> >> One shortcoming of relying on OS
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 06:22:46PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> wrote:
> > From: Nico Williams [mailto:n...@cryptonector.com]
> >
> >> One shortcoming of relying on OS functionality for protection against
> >> malicious storage is that not
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
wrote:
> From: Nico Williams [mailto:n...@cryptonector.com]
>> Let's start with a set of threat models then. I'll go first:
>
> Thank you so much for summarizing the current situation. I'd appreciate it
> if you could write this on the
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:31:44AM +, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> From: Nico Williams [mailto:n...@cryptonector.com]
> > Let's start with a set of threat models then. I'll go first:
>
> Thank you so much for summarizing the current situation. I'd
> appreciate it if you could write this on
From: Nico Williams [mailto:n...@cryptonector.com]
> Let's start with a set of threat models then. I'll go first:
Thank you so much for summarizing the current situation. I'd appreciate it if
you could write this on the PostgreSQL wiki, when the discussion has settled
somehow.
> - local
