Re: View with duplicate GROUP BY entries

Robert Haas writes: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, we probably ought to make more of an effort to regenerate the >> original query wording. I do not think that forcing positional notation >> is a suitable answer in this

Re: View with duplicate GROUP BY entries

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Ashutosh Bapat writes: >> While reviewing patch for similar problem in postgres_fdw [1], I >> noticed that we don't use positional notation while creating the view. >> This might introduced

Re: View with duplicate GROUP BY entries

Ashutosh Bapat writes: > While reviewing patch for similar problem in postgres_fdw [1], I > noticed that we don't use positional notation while creating the view. > This might introduced anomalies when GROUP BY entries are > non-immutable. Yeah, we probably ought