On 24 April 2018 at 03:00, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Thank you, pushed
Thanks!
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Thank you, pushed
David Rowley wrote:
bms_prev_member mistakenly has a hardcoded 24 in the function. This
should really be BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD - 8 so that it is properly set to
56 if someone compiles with 64-bit bitmapwords.
The attached fixes this and also adds a test to exercise the function
bms_prev_member mistakenly has a hardcoded 24 in the function. This
should really be BITS_PER_BITMAPWORD - 8 so that it is properly set to
56 if someone compiles with 64-bit bitmapwords.
The attached fixes this and also adds a test to exercise the function
a bit. [1] indicates there's currently