On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:47:27AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 03:22, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > |This is useful if only a small percentage of rows is checked on
> > |the inner side and is controlled by > |linkend="guc-enable-resultcache"/>.
>
> You
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 12:01, David Rowley wrote:
> I plan on pushing the patch to master and PG14 in 24 hours time. If
> anyone is still on the fence or wishes to object to the name, please
> let it be known before then.
Renaming complete. Result Cache is gone. Welcome Memoize.
David
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 01:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> David Rowley writes:
> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 03:22, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >> |This is useful if only a small percentage of rows is checked on
> >> |the inner side and is controlled by >> |
David Rowley writes:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 03:22, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> |This is useful if only a small percentage of rows is checked on
>> |the inner side and is controlled by > |linkend="guc-enable-resultcache"/>.
> You might be right there, but I'm not too sure
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 03:22, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> |This is useful if only a small percentage of rows is checked on
> |the inner side and is controlled by |linkend="guc-enable-resultcache"/>.
You might be right there, but I'm not too sure if I changed that that
it
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 02:56:58AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 07:30, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:35 AM David Rowley wrote:
> > > I really like that name.
> > >
> > > I'll wait to see if anyone else wants to voice their opinion before I
> > > do
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:35 AM David Rowley wrote:
> I really like that name.
>
> I'll wait to see if anyone else wants to voice their opinion before I
> do any renaming work.
I like it, too.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 06:00, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"?
I really like that name.
I'll wait to see if anyone else wants to voice their opinion before I
do any renaming work.
David
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 6:03 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"?
>
> +1
+1
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"?
>
>
+1
David J.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 12:51:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Are we going to be forever explaining that enable_resultcache doesn't
> cache query results? Do we need a different name?
> enable_innerjoin_cache?
See also
> On 8 Jul 2021, at 19:52, David G. Johnston wrote:
> "enable_nodememoization" would work for me
Include "node" concatenated with other words risks users reading it as "enable
no demomoization", with confusion following.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> "enable_nodememoization" would work for me
That seems pretty unreadable. Maybe just "enable_memoization"?
Really if we're going to do something here, we can't merely mess
with the GUC name. David had expressed a willingness to rename
everything about ResultCache
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:29 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 12:51 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Are we going to be forever explaining that enable_resultcache doesn't
> > cache query results?
>
> Yes, I can see that causing ongoing confusion. Naming things is really
> hard...
>
>
I
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 12:51 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Are we going to be forever explaining that enable_resultcache doesn't
> cache query results?
Yes, I can see that causing ongoing confusion. Naming things is really hard...
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Are we going to be forever explaining that enable_resultcache doesn't
cache query results? Do we need a different name?
enable_innerjoin_cache?
--
Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world
16 matches
Mail list logo
