Hi,
how long is PG7.1 already in beta testing? can it be released before Christmas day?
can PG7.1 will recover database from system crash?
Thanks,
XuYifeng
Now, given the two components, each with very low costs, it chooses to
do a sequential scan on the table. I don't get it.
Read the FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#4.23
"4.23) Why are my subqueries using IN so slow?")
- Andrew
Judging by the information below, taken *directly* from PostgreSQL, Inc.
website, it appears that they will be releasing all code into the main
source code branch -- with the exception of "Advanced Replication and
Distributed Information capabilities" (to which capabilities they are
referring is
In fact, it might seem to be common courtesy...
An odd choice of words coming from you Don.
We are offering our services and expertise to a community outside
-hackers, as a business formed in a way that this new community expects
to see. Nothing special or sinister here. Other than it seems to
Zeugswetter Andreas SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today I inserted (unsigned char) casts into all the ctype.h function
calls I could find. This issue should be fixed as of current cvs.
Please try it again when you have time.
I am a sceptic to the many casts. Would'nt the clean solution be,
I maybe wrong but I think that PGSQL is not threaded mostly due to
historical reasons. It looks to me like the source has developed over
time where much of the source is not reentrant with many global variables
throughout. In addition, the parser is generated by flex which
can be made to
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
At 11:59 PM 12/3/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
the sanctity of the *core* server is *always*
foremost in our minds, no matter what other projects we are working on ...
What happens if financially things aren't entirely rosy with your
company?
Hi,
on other RDBMS (Oracle,etc...),there is an index called bitmap index that
greatly improve performance compared to btree index for boolean value
(such as for a sex value,it's either M or F),i would like to know if such
index will be implemented inside PostgreSQL.
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Junfeng Zhang wrote:
Hello all,
I am new to postgreSQL. When I read the documents, I find out the
Postmaster daemon actual spawns a new backend server process to serve
a new client request. Why not use threads instead? Is that just for a
historical reason, or some
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
A recent example of non-sinister change in another area is the work done
to release 7.0.3. This is a release which would not have happened in
previous cycles, since we are so close to beta on 7.1. But GB paid Tom
Lane to work on it as part of *their*
i have wrote an application dealing with ean13 and ean8 type,how can i
submit it ??
Ean13 and ean8 are bar codes for european.
You can convert an ISBN or iSSN to Ean13.
My addon add a new type and can convert isbn to an EAN
and calculate th key of ean. More over in few day
add on can store the png or jpg images of bar codes
in blob type or
TODO: add upc-A upc-E ean128 and
Hi,
on other RDBMS (Oracle,etc...),there is an index called bitmap index that
greatly improve performance compared to btree index for boolean value
(such as for a sex value,it's either M or F),i would like to know if such
index will be implemented inside PostgreSQL.
Best regards,
PEJAC Pascal
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Nathan Myers wrote:
Second, the transaction log is not, as has been noted far too frequently
for Vince's comfort, really written atomically. The OS has promised
to write it atomically, and given the opportunity, it will. If you pull
the plug, all promises are broken.
* Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001204 09:27]:
"Billy G. Allie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... The DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO definition was originally put in to work
around a macro size limitation of the UnixWare 2.1 C compiler (and
later the SCO UDK (Universal Development Kit)). If the gnu C
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Sandeep Joshi wrote:
1. Is it possible to set up a set of redundant disks for a database? one
of them being remote from the database?
Call IBM Global Services, and tell them you are interested in purchasing
an RS/6000 with a 7133 SSA drives, one tray off-site using the
Tom Lane wrote:
"Billy G. Allie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... The DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO definition was originally put in to work
around a macro size limitation of the UnixWare 2.1 C compiler (and
later the SCO UDK (Universal Development Kit)). If the gnu C compiler
is being used it
If you're talking about replication, PostgreSQL, Inc. will be offering a
solution to its $19,000/yr Platinum Partners shortly. It will be released
in open source form no more than two years after its release in proprietary
form.
Check out http://www.erserver.com for more details, and
posting for others who may need, hopfuly the searchable mail list works
in the future
commenting out the define complex macro allowed me to compile on sco
5.0.5 using udk compiler on sco, without the c++ stuff. but scos udk
solution breaks almost every thing else i compile on sco 5.0.5 when u
Tom Lane writes:
I ask because we recently pulled "#define DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO" from
port/sco.h, on the grounds that various people were seeing more harm
than good from it. But I'm suddenly wondering whether those people
might've been using gcc.
We can be fairly certain that they
Radek Fleks writes:
I'm compiling (not, I'm trying to compile) last version of Postgresql on
Sequent Dynix/ptx ver 4.4.7 system. Under compilation process with gcc (ver
2.7.2 ported on dynix/pt) is reporting several errors.
It's not so interesting at this point to port PostgreSQL 7.0.*,
if we were to do this in steps, I beliee that one of the major problems
irght now is that we have global variables up the wazoo ... my
'thread-awareness' is limited, as I've yet to use them, so excuse my
ignorance ... if we got patches that cleaned up the code in stages, moving
towards a cleaner
I browsed through the CVS logs and made this list of the important
stuff. There's a ton of less important stuff...
Shall we consider this the start of the list then? I think there may be
a couple of things already mentioned in the release note stubs for 7.1
too.
- Thomas
Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
I'm about 99.67% sure that the lock type choosen in the
FOR UPDATE case (line 511 of parse_relation.c) should be
RowExclusiveLock instead of RowShareLock. Actually I get
"Deadlock risk" debug messages when selecting FOR UPDATE and
Macaddr manufacturer table update now in SQL table
syslog configurability improvements.
* Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001204 13:42]:
I browsed through the CVS logs and made this list of the important
stuff. There's a ton of less important stuff...
Shall we consider this the start
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm about 99.67% sure that the lock type choosen in the
FOR UPDATE case (line 511 of parse_relation.c) should be
RowExclusiveLock instead of RowShareLock. Actually I get
"Deadlock risk" debug messages when selecting FOR
The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not use threads instead? Is that just for a
historical reason, or some performance/implementation concern?
Several reasons, 'historical' probably being the strongest right now
... since PostgreSQL was never designed for threading, its about as
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 18:13:47 -0500
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD
4.1-RELEASE) ?
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL
Zeugswetter Andreas SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But don't they in general obfuscate cases where the callee does want
unsigned/signed chars ?
Well, it's ugly, but I don't think we have much choice. Seems to me
that changing to "unsigned char" throughout the backend would obfuscate
things
All the major operating systems should have POSIX threads implemented.
Actually this can be configurable--multithreads or one thread.
Thread-only server is unsafe, I agree. Maybe the following model can be a
little better. Several servers, each is multi-threaded. Every server can
support a
Hi. Could any kind soul tell me what's amiss here. I'm trying
to build pg7.0.3 on a friend's box - over the net.
Kind of like driving from the backseat. ;-)
My src builds but the linker barfs with:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/postgresql-7.0.3/src/backend/utils'
gcc -I../include
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom,
IIRC the "Deadlock risk" debug message is from you. I think
it must get a little smarter. IMHO an application that want's
to UPDATE something in a transaction but must SELECT the
row(s) first to do it's own calculation on
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 02:28:10PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:42:24PM -0600, Junfeng Zhang wrote:
I am new to postgreSQL. When I read the documents, I find out the Postmaster
daemon actual spawns a new backend server process to serve a new client
request. Why
Hi everyone,
I've recently encountered a bizzare problem that manifests itself reliably
on my running copy of postgres. I have a system set up to track IPs. The
arrangement uses two mutually-exclusive buckets, one for free IPs and
the other for used ones. There are rules set up on the used pool
Adam Haberlach writes:
Typically (on a well-written OS, at least), the spawning of a thread
is much cheaper then the creation of a new process (via fork()).
This would be well worth testing on some representative sample
systems.
Within the past year and a half at one of my gigs some coworkers
Don Baccus wrote:
...
I expect TOAST to work even better). Users will still be able change to
larger blocksizes (perhaps a wise thing to do if a large percentage of their
data won't fit into a single PG block). Users using the default will
be able to store rows of *awesome* length,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:17:00PM -0800, Adam Haberlach wrote:
Typically (on a well-written OS, at least), the spawning of a thread
is much cheaper then the creation of a new process (via fork()).
Unless I'm mistaken, the back-end is only forked when starting a new
connection, in which
*snip*
Once all the questions regarding "why not" have been answered, it would
be good to also ask "why use threads?" Do they simplify the code? Do
they offer significant performance or efficiency gains? What do they
give, other than being buzzword compliant?
The
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 02:30:31PM -0800, Dan Lyke wrote:
Adam Haberlach writes:
Typically (on a well-written OS, at least), the spawning of a thread
is much cheaper then the creation of a new process (via fork()).
This would be well worth testing on some representative sample
systems.
Matthew wrote:
The primary advantage that I see is that a single postgres process
can benefit from multiple processors. I see little advantage to using thread
for client connections.
Multiprocessors best benefit multiple backends. And the current forked
model lends itself admirably
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 04:28:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on other RDBMS (Oracle,etc...),there is an index called bitmap index
that greatly improve performance compared to btree index for boolean
value (such as for a sex value,it's either M or F),i would like to
know if such index
I would love to distribute this code to anybody who wants it. Any
suggestions for a good place? However, calling the
work a code redesign is a bit generous. This was more like a
brute force hack. I just moved all the connection related global
variables to
a thread local "environment variable"
There ya go, I figured it out :) Given the name a table, this query will
return all foreign keys in that table, the table the primary key is in,
the name of the primary key, if the are deferrable, if the are initially
deffered, and the action to be performed (RESTRICT, SET NULL, etc.). To
get
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ some very interesting datapoints ]
So, forking a process with lots of data is expensive. However, most of
the PostgreSQL data is in a SysV IPC shared memory segment, which
shouldn't affect the fork numbers.
I believe (but don't have numbers to
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Junfeng Zhang wrote:
All the major operating systems should have POSIX threads implemented.
Actually this can be configurable--multithreads or one thread.
I don't understand this. The OS can be configured for one thread? How
would that be any of use?
Thread-only
45 matches
Mail list logo
