At 03:05 PM 27-08-2001 -0400, Alex Pilosov wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> THIS IS WHAT I CANT SEEM TO FIGURE OUT IN POSTGRESQL
>> 1. I cant get a clear answer on what kind of data type to use for my large
>> text string? TEXT, ???, ??? or something about TOAST
>> I have
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The fundamental problem with bug tracking has been that the available
> tools do not fit with our obviously successful mailing-list centered
> development process. I certainly would consider it a distraction to
> consult that tool to be able to partici
Ya, lets go with the 10th of Sept, which is a Monday, start of the week
and all that, everyone has had a chance to relax once "the kids" are back
in school and all that :)
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... Beta may start as soon as Saturday
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What version of aCC are you using?
$ what /opt/aCC/bin/aCC
/opt/aCC/bin/aCC:
HP aC++ B3910B A.01.00
HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.00.03
/usr/lib/libc: $Revision: 76.3 $
It's whatever shipped with HPUX 10.20, AFAIR. For my purposes, the
fact that it's
> > Certainly everyone would agree that "locale support" is desirable.
> No...
That is why I put "locale support" in double-quotes. Sorry that I was
cryptic, but I do understand your concern that OS-specific locale
support is suspect for some languages.
> In my opinion, with the SQL99 collate su
*whimper* I've been out of town for a week, and will not be able to
catch up with ~2000 email messages. So I can't even get to the end of
this thread. But I must agree that PostgreSQL development is pushing the
limits of what a person can keep up with.
> I am not interested in finding a mailing l
> > Face it, everything has locale support these day. PostgreSQL is one of
> > the few packages that even has it as an option to turn it off. Users of
> > binary packages of PostgreSQL are all invariably faced with locale
> > features. So it's not like sudden unasked-for locale support is going
> > Does anyone else have work that they're trying to finish up before
> > we go beta?
> >
>
> Well, I did have a question that got lost in the details of the recent
bytea
> discussion. Specifically it was this: is there a good reason that byteaout
> octal escapes all non-printable characters?
>
>
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we want ADD PRIMARY KEY?
If you can get it done in the next week or so ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
ht
"Joe Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... is there a good reason that byteaout
> octal escapes all non-printable characters?
Well, AFAICS it *has to* escape nulls (zero bytes). Whether it escapes
more stuff is a matter of taste once you accept that.
What we really need to have to make byte
Do we want ADD PRIMARY KEY?
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2001 8:56 AM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming events
>
>
> Bruce Momjian <[EM
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:16:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Today I did something I usually do about once per release cycle: try to
> build the system with HP's vendor cc, rather than gcc which I prefer.
> This usually turns up some portability issues, and indeed I found some.
> One that I'm not e
> Does anyone else have work that they're trying to finish up before
> we go beta?
>
Well, I did have a question that got lost in the details of the recent bytea
discussion. Specifically it was this: is there a good reason that byteaout
octal escapes all non-printable characters?
ISTM that if yo
> Face it, everything has locale support these day. PostgreSQL is one of
> the few packages that even has it as an option to turn it off. Users of
> binary packages of PostgreSQL are all invariably faced with locale
> features. So it's not like sudden unasked-for locale support is going to
> be
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... Beta may start as soon as Saturday, September 1.
My guess is that end of *next* week would be more appropriate.
Personally I've finished all the major items I wanted to do for 7.2,
but there are still some little things that it'd be nice to clean u
Today I did something I usually do about once per release cycle: try to
build the system with HP's vendor cc, rather than gcc which I prefer.
This usually turns up some portability issues, and indeed I found some.
One that I'm not entirely sure about how to fix is that libpq++ no
longer builds at
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a patch that might be considered (remove static for these
> globals).
Actually, they are not globals AFAICS, so removing the header extern
seemed the more appropriate fix.
regards, tom lane
---
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Current sources don't compile on AIX with xlc compiler because of the
> combined (and inconsistent ? or compiler bug) use of extern and static
> for the datetktbl in datetime.c.
Fixed. A pass with HP's compiler also showed up a static-v
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> THIS IS WHAT I CANT SEEM TO FIGURE OUT IN POSTGRESQL
> 1. I cant get a clear answer on what kind of data type to use for my large
> text string? TEXT, ???, ??? or something about TOAST
> I have seen in the e-mail archive but cant find any documentai
I would like to learn more about Multi-Version Concurrency Control
Other than http://pgsql.profnet.pl/osdn/transactions.pdf, where can I
find more resource?
--
Carfield Yim, visit my homepage at http://www.carfield.com.hk
---(end of broadcast)
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 01:09:14PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying my best to convert from MySQL to PgSQL but I cant get a good
> answer about
> certian questions. It was an easy task in mysql but all this talk about
> , text , toast and bytea is just confusing me.
> I cant get a cle
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:45:40AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > test=> \lo_unlink 89803
> > > ERROR: pg_description: Permission denied.
> >
> > Hmm. Maybe those client-side comment manipulations in psql aren't
> > such a
How is posible show the date in european format. By defalut it's ISO. I
can show with "SET datestyle=postgres" but is validate from one sesion
only.
Thanks
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.
Fine for me also.
Leandro.
Tom Lane wrote:
> Leandro Fanzone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have compiled PostgreSQL 7.1.2 with gcc 3.0.1, and have the following
> > problem: if I include first libpq++.h before iostream, id est:
> > #include
> > #include
> > the compiler complains:
>
> > T
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is include/config.h still supposed to be in CVS?
What? config.h was never supposed to be in CVS.
config.h.in has been renamed to pg_config.h.in, see Peter's recent
activity ...
regards, tom lane
---(en
I'm trying my best to convert from MySQL to PgSQL but I cant get a good
answer about
certian questions. It was an easy task in mysql but all this talk about
, text , toast and bytea is just confusing me.
I cant get a clear picture of any of this,from the book from Bruce, the
e-mail archives. Ive
Marc wrote:
> Actually, the 'multi-day' delay is generally related to posts from ppl
> that aren't subscribed to the lists that I have to approve manually ...
Is there a quick(er) way to 'subscribe, set nomail' on all the mailing lists
that are mirrored to news.postgresql.org?
I prefer to read/p
>
> > The way I see it there are 4 options for the OID:
>
What about a vacuum analyze for the database that renumbers theOIDs
back at some baseline? There is still a limitation on the total number
of active rows in the database (0.5 * 2^32), but at least we wouldn't
have this timebomb.
Dale Joh
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the
> > > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen
> > > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend.
> >
>
> I was incorrect in something I said to
Hi,
I'm going to vacation and will be totally offline and
Teodor is already enjoy Cyprus. He will be back
september 8-9. I'll be back september 19.
Regards,
Oleg
_
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of As
Current sources don't compile on AIX with xlc compiler because of the
combined (and inconsistent ? or compiler bug) use of extern and static
for the datetktbl in datetime.c.
header unconditionally has:
extern datetkn datetktbl[];
source has:
static datetkn datetktbl[] = {
The usual approach
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:05:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Were are we on this? We keep talking about NOCREATETABLE permission for
> every release but can't seem to get it in there because people want a
> redesign of permissions. My feeling is that it should be added to 7.2.
I know ve
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 09:29:06PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>
> > > Maybe we should not touch getdatabaseencoding() right now, given that the
> > > names we currently use are apparently almost correct anyway and
> > > considering the pain it creates to alter them, and
33 matches
Mail list logo
