I've always considered a table definition to be an unordered hash so
the concept of putting something in the "middle of a table" from that
view doesn't seem to have a point.
Just my $0.02
Shahbaz Javeed
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 21:44:24 +0200, Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher
> Given the 8.0 ALTER TABLE feature of being able to rewrite the whole
> table, one could now think about doing it without decoupling logical
> and physical numbers: just rewrite the table with the new column
> inserted in the proper place. This moves the problem to a different
> area, which is be
> I want to clarify this.
> The point of the core is they won't do it because
> they have things more important to do, or, the feature
> will never be part of the postgresql even if someone
> else contribute it.
>
> Maybe i am not capable of contribute it but i will
> try if the feature will be bec
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |> ERROR: invalid string enlargement request size 1476395004
> |> DEBUG: AbortCurrentTransaction
> |> WARNING: AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
> |> ERROR: could not send data to client: Broken pipe
> |> PANIC: error during error recov
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Christopher Browne wrote:
... And since APR isn't BSD licensed, that would probably cause a
problem.
They are changin license for APR and I'll be not surprised if they
adopth the BSD one.
Since Apache has developed their own license, and I've seen at leas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
| Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|>I don't know if APR provide a spin lock mechanism,
|
|
| You don't even know that, but you're confident that we can throw away
| our spinlock work and use APR anyway. You're wasting our ti
Christopher Browne wrote:
... And since APR isn't BSD licensed, that would probably cause a
problem.
They are changin license for APR and I'll be not surprised if they
adopth the BSD one.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if po
Attempted to install PostgreSQL 8.0beta1 on AIX 5.2 on a POWER4+ system
today. 7.4.5 worked fine (with header warnings), but 8.0 failed to
compile.
Full log attached.
Uname -a: AIX newman_l1 2 5 61FA4C00
Log snippit:
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/sitesell/postgresql-8.0.0beta1/src/timez
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
use it on Postgres?
The sense of the question is backwards. Why *should* we use it?
In order to avoid all the annoyance that someone else had in
write code p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't see the last post about the issue I had
and that was solved ( due I think to last days problems),
I post it here again:
Tom Lane wrote:
| Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't you think that use of APR could save time ?
No, because we've already *done* the work it would purport to save.
It would cost us work to adapt our code to sit on top of APR, and
it's not clear to me that we'd be getting anything for it.
IIRC, th
=?iso-8859-1?q?Jaime=20Casanova?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The point of the core is they won't do it because
> they have things more important to do, or, the feature
> will never be part of the postgresql even if someone
> else contribute it.
We looked at this and decided that it would be vas
Tom Lane wrote:
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
use it on Postgres?
The sense of the question is backwards. Why *should* we use it?
In order to avoid all the annoyance that someone else had in
write code portable. I mean, how much
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Sent: Sat 9/4/2004 2:24 PM
To: Jim C. Nasby
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thesis on PostgreSQL
> The only "generation" differentiation I have ever heard about i
--- Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
> > Hi guys i was looking for the
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php in order
> >to view what things are you posponing for later
> > versions
> > but the entire developer.postgresql.org site is
> > down.
> >
> >
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
> use it on Postgres?
The sense of the question is backwards. Why *should* we use it?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)-
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been playing with OSDL DBT-3 for a while and found very strange
> phenomemon.
What can you tell us about the physical ordering of the tables involved?
The only way I can think of to explain these results is that "orders"
is more or less physically in
On L, 2004-09-04 at 17:35, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been playing with OSDL DBT-3 for a while and found very strange
> phenomemon. The query in question is Q4:
>
> select o_orderpriority, count(*) as order_count from orders where
> o_orderdate >= date '1997-10-01' and o_orderdate < (date
On L, 2004-09-04 at 16:24, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:11:54 -0500
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm not aware of any generally accepted definitions of generations
> > > of > > database management systems.
> >
> > Nor am I, but I'd say MySQL would be at lea
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Hi all,
now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
use it on Postgres?
Short question: why? what does it give us, other then potential reliance
on another project to build ... ?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (ht
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Hi all,
now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
use it on Postgres?
Now that we have discovered the formula for green cheese, why don't we
remake the moon out of it?
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8
Hi all,
now that Apache Portable Runtime was release why don't
use it on Postgres?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Christopher Browne wrote:
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaime Casanova) would write:
By the way, will be a way in postgresql 8 to add a
column in a middle of a table. just curious.
What do you mean by "in a middle of a table?" A relation is simply a
set of attributes
Jaime Casanova wrote:
Hi guys i was looking for the
http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php in order to
view what things are you posponing for later versions
but the entire developer.postgresql.org site is down.
By the way, will be a way in postgresql 8 to add a
column in a middle of a table. just
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:11:54 -0500
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not aware of any generally accepted definitions of generations
> > of > > database management systems.
>
> Nor am I, but I'd say MySQL would be at least 2 if not 3 or 4
> generations behind PostgreSQL if there was
Hi,
I've been playing with OSDL DBT-3 for a while and found very strange
phenomemon. The query in question is Q4:
select o_orderpriority, count(*) as order_count from orders where
o_orderdate >= date '1997-10-01' and o_orderdate < (date
'1997-10-01' + interval '3 month')::date and o_orderkey in (
venus went down on Thursday, late ... as soon as I realized it was going
to be down for longer then normal (I hate fsck), I changed the DNS so that
it pointed to the www*.us.postgresql.org mirrors, which, of course, didn't
work since they are all using VirtualNameHosts as opposed to IP ... once
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 09:24:04AM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:11:54 -0500
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm not aware of any generally accepted definitions of generations
> > > of > > database management systems.
> >
> > Nor am I, but I'd say MySQL
28 matches
Mail list logo
