On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've written some quick scripts. One just vacuums constantly (999 vacuums
> > to 1 vacuum full) while three other scripts three randomly insert
> > into, update and delete from 3 tables. There's a mix of small and
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 23:16:14 -0400,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have compiled the 8.1 release notes and converted them to SGML at:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/release.html#RELEASE-8-1
>
> I still need to add markup and cleanup, but it is good enough for
> review and
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:01:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is anybody working on allowing indexes to span multiple tables?
> > IF not, I'll give it a try.
>
> Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker;
> the locking conside
I have compiled the 8.1 release notes and converted them to SGML at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/release.html#RELEASE-8-1
I still need to add markup and cleanup, but it is good enough for
review and for beta1. I will work on it more tomorrow.
--
Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>... But I agree with Satoshi; if there are
>>people who will benefit from this option (which doesn't hurt those who
>>choose not to use it), why not put it in?
>
>
> Because there's no such thing as a free lunch. Every option we s
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My original point was that if you don't have permission to do something,
> you shouldn't be able to grant permissions to do it. This applies to all
> the permissions, not just superuser (though that one's obviously the
> most dangerous). Granted, at this
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... But I agree with Satoshi; if there are
> people who will benefit from this option (which doesn't hurt those who
> choose not to use it), why not put it in?
Because there's no such thing as a free lunch. Every option we support
costs us in initial i
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:19:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, but it doesn't really specify if you have to have a privilege in order
> > to grant it, although reading one of the notes[1] tends to indicate that
> > you must have a role in order to gra
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> foo=# create role foo with createdb;
> CREATE ROLE
> foo=# create user foo;
> ERROR: role "foo" already exists
> I understand what is happening, but perhaps the error should be:
> A role "foo" already exists which can not be the same as a username?
* Allow ALTER TABLE ... ALTER CONSTRAINT ... RENAME
That one is easy and handy.
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
"Jim Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but it doesn't really specify if you have to have a privilege in order
> to grant it, although reading one of the notes[1] tends to indicate that you
> must have a role in order to grant it. Unless I'm overlooking some part of
> the docs?
It says
Josh Berkus writes:
> I find the addition a little baffling, since previous tests ... both mine,
> and discussion of tests last December ... showed that manipulating the
> bgwriter variables had no useful effects, and one might as well leave them
> alone.
Perhaps that just proves that you're u
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:56:48PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> First off, I was going through PostgreSQL.conf.sample, and noticed that the
> bgwriter GUCs had multiplied:
>
> #bgwriter_delay = 200 # 10-1 milliseconds between rounds
> #bgwriter_lru_percent = 1.0 # 0-1
I wrote:
> I've been sniffing around that patch and not really finding any smoking
> gun about why it would make things slower when you're not using O_DIRECT.
While rewriting the patch to fit more naturally into xlog.c, I found a
bug that might possibly be related to your performance issue. The
i
Hello,
When doing:
SELECT * FROM pg_user;
foo=# select * from pg_user;
usename | usesysid | usecreatedb | usesuper | usecatupd | passwd |
valuntil | useconfig
-+--+-+--+---+--+--+---
jd | 10 | t | t
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Can someone turn these items into a "beginning hacker's TODO" as has
> been discussed before? Or find a way to mark them on the main TODO?
>
> If someone wants to tell me how this should be done and give me whatever
> files need to be changed I'd be happy to submit a patch.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:53:14PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> If someone wants to mark easy items on the TODO list with some mark,
> like %, I can apply the patch. Please patch TODO and not TODO.html.
I'll take a stab at this unless someone else beats me to it; though I'm
not a coder myself
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
Would work on one of the pl languages constitute a good place for a
beginning hacker to start?
plPerl, plPython, plRuby, and plPHP all need support for IN/OUT
parameters I believe.
Probably need named parameter support first, I suspect.
But I also suspec
Folks,
First off, I was going through PostgreSQL.conf.sample, and noticed that the
bgwriter GUCs had multiplied:
#bgwriter_delay = 200 # 10-1 milliseconds between rounds
#bgwriter_lru_percent = 1.0 # 0-100% of LRU buffers scanned in each
round
#bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 5 #
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >> Actually they are both bad projects. The "include file" patch was
> >> submitted by the @mohawksoft guy whose name I can't remember; it was
> >> rejected with good reasons. The money type was proposed for removal
> >> some time ago, and the author also asked not to.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:28:54PM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> On Monday 22 August 2005 13:13, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Of course we could use pgbench for this instead of dbt*, but ISTM that
> > dbt is a better choice since it's useful for a broader set of people.
> > The downside is it requir
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:24 -0500, Rosser Schwarz wrote:
> while you weren't looking, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> [indexes spanning multiple tables]
>
> > Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker;
> > the locking considerations alone are a bit daunting.
>
> That being the case,
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I thought about that, but is seems all our booleans could logically fall
> into the category of being enabled/disabled. For add_missing_from, the
> add word is so people realize that it is really _adding_ to the FROM
> list, so I see it as different.
>
> Anyway, change
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:53:22AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Aug 22, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> >>> To others who've written their own sleep() function: what are you
> >>> using it for?
>
> > I know I've used one for a script that reind
Hello,
Would work on one of the pl languages constitute a good place for a
beginning hacker to start?
plPerl, plPython, plRuby, and plPHP all need support for IN/OUT
parameters I believe.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.224
Greg Stark wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I thought about that, but is seems all our booleans could logically fall
> > into the category of being enabled/disabled. For add_missing_from, the
> > add word is so people realize that it is really _adding_ to the FROM
> > list, so I see it as
Jim,
> Anything more on this? Contest start is in just over 3 weeks...
Nope. I've get to get a committer to promise to review submitted tests.
That's the main thing I need before we can commit to participation.
I'll also be drafting some docs on requirements for regression tests, but
that'
Actually they are both bad projects. The "include file" patch was
submitted by the @mohawksoft guy whose name I can't remember; it was
rejected with good reasons. The money type was proposed for removal
some time ago, and the author also asked not to.
Well the money type seems it should be a
If someone wants to mark easy items on the TODO list with some mark,
like %, I can apply the patch. Please patch TODO and not TODO.html.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Rosser Schwarz wrote:
>
> >while you weren't lookin
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:50:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Satoshi Nagayasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've done a quick hack to implement PCTFREE on PostgreSQL.
> > ...
> > According to my experiments, pgbench score was improved 10% or more
> > with 1024 bytes free space.
>
> I'm not very e
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:31:04PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> A couple of nice visible projects on the TODO list that might be
> suitable for beginners:
>
> . Add "include file" functionality in postgresql.conf
> . Remove Money type, add money formatting for decimal type
Actually they are b
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
> >
> > show_parser_stats true
> > enable_hashjoin true
> >
> > Nouns sound stranger and more awkward:
> >
> > geqo true
> > parser_stats true
> > hashjoin true
>
> Interesting analysis. No verb in there.
Note that the verb isn't always the same a
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:31:04PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Rosser Schwarz wrote:
>
> >while you weren't looking, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >[indexes spanning multiple tables]
> >
> >
> >
> >>Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker;
> >>the locking considerations
Greg Stark wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Greg Stark wrote:
> > >
> > > show_parser_stats true
> > > enable_hashjoin true
> > >
> > > Nouns sound stranger and more awkward:
> > >
> > > geqo true
> > > parser_stats true
> > > hashjoin true
> >
> > Interesting analysis. No verb in ther
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:31:04PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
A couple of nice visible projects on the TODO list that might be
suitable for beginners:
. Add "include file" functionality in postgresql.conf
. Remove Money type, add money formatting for decimal type
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 3:18 PM
> To: Jim Nasby
> Cc: Bruno Wolff III; William ZHANG; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CREATE USER and pg_user
>
>
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:53:28AM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> I have a realworld test case of delete cascade (approx 90 cascaded tables,
> some more than 8 levels deep) failing on 8.0.3 (and 8.1) , this is one of a
> few issues that is preventing me from upgrading a couple of 7.4 boxen to
Anything more on this? Contest start is in just over 3 weeks...
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:48:08AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Those of you who went to OSCON may have heard that SpikeSource is having a
> contest to increase testing code coverage of popular OSS projects. The
> contes
On Monday 22 August 2005 13:13, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:29:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
> > > constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:24:34AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > So why bother with driving multiple invocations of psql under
> > > Expect. Just use DBD::Pg to open as many connections as you want and
> > > is
On E, 2005-08-22 at 16:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is anybody working on allowing indexes to span multiple tables?
> > IF not, I'll give it a try.
>
> Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker;
> the locking considerations a
Rosser Schwarz wrote:
while you weren't looking, Tom Lane wrote:
[indexes spanning multiple tables]
Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker;
the locking considerations alone are a bit daunting.
That being the case, is there a list anywhere of open/wish li
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:29:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
> > constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
> > create a branch called "test-set--mm-dd" or some
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:49:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I played around with roles a bit today and noticed some minor things:
>
> > ALTER ROLE seems to support ALTER ROLE ROLE - but that
> > form is not mentioned in the docs:
>
> There ar
It turns out I made a mistake in trying to be too smart about adding E''
escapes for ecpg strings that have backslashes. I have reversed the
attached patch to fix the problem. Thanks for the report.
---
Michael Fuhr wrote
On E, 2005-08-22 at 14:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But I could not find the breakage (from your Aug 17 email) with
>
> >> You missed vac_truncate_clog, though.
>
> That was fixed (and documented), along with some other problems,
> in the modified pat
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:55:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> For more information take a look at the CREATE ROLE command in the
>> developer docs.
> ISTM that it's a bug to be able to assign permissions that you don't
> yourself have. In this cas
while you weren't looking, Tom Lane wrote:
[indexes spanning multiple tables]
> Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker;
> the locking considerations alone are a bit daunting.
That being the case, is there a list anywhere of open/wish list/TODO
items that are suitable f
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about going the route of tcsh (and I'm sure others) where ^D shows
> you what your options are for tab-completion? This makes it much easier
> to find the option you're looking for.
readline does that already ... just not with ^D (which seems a dan
Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anybody working on allowing indexes to span multiple tables?
> IF not, I'll give it a try.
Wouldn't recommend it as a project for a beginning backend hacker;
the locking considerations alone are a bit daunting.
See the archives for prior discussi
Learn something new every day...
(and yeah, I never understood why tcsh uses ^D, especially that if you do ^D on
a newline you disconnect...)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive Softwarehttp://pervasive.com512-569-9461
> -Original Me
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:39:59AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I am wondering if is worth managing which items should be displayed or
> > not, and if we should just give up and display them all. The GUC system
> > is just too dynamic.
>
> Not sure. I count 98 GUC variable
On Monday 22 August 2005 11:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Aug 22, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> >>> To others who've written their own sleep() function: what are you
> >>> using it for?
> >
> > I know I've used one for a script that reindexes vari
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:55:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 18:11:54 +0800,
> William ZHANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "create user foo with createdb" will create a user with createdb privilege.
> > "create user bar with createuser" will create s superuser who c
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I could not find the breakage (from your Aug 17 email) with
>> You missed vac_truncate_clog, though.
That was fixed (and documented), along with some other problems,
in the modified patch I sent back to you:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-pa
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >>I am thinking we should just call it constraint_exclusion.
> >
> >
> > So, given the silence on this, I assume people think we should rename
> > this before beta starts.
>
> Well it depends either one seems correct per the postgresql.conf. For
> example enable_se
Is anybody working on allowing indexes to span multiple tables?
IF not, I'll give it a try.
--
Make April 15 just another day, visit http://fairtax.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:24:34AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So why bother with driving multiple invocations of psql under
> > Expect. Just use DBD::Pg to open as many connections as you want and
> > issue whatever queries you want.
>
> The bit that I thin
I am thinking we should just call it constraint_exclusion.
So, given the silence on this, I assume people think we should rename
this before beta starts.
Well it depends either one seems correct per the postgresql.conf. For
example enable_seqscan, or "add"_missing_from_clause.
It seems th
Bruce Momjian writes:
> pgman wrote:
>> Is enable_constraint_exclusion the proper name for this feature? I know
>> we have enable* in the optimizer settings, but that naming seems
>> unfortunate in that we should have just called it hash_join and it could
>> be enabled/disabled.
>>
>> I am think
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Aug 22, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>>> To others who've written their own sleep() function: what are you
>>> using it for?
> I know I've used one for a script that reindexes various tables on an
> old 7.3 server. I put a sleep of 20 second
On E, 2005-08-22 at 10:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please try to apply the patch, even if dangling BEGIN WORK; still causes
> > problems - I'll fix this tomorrow.
>
> No. A patch that you yourself have so little confidence in, in a
> fundamental part
Greg Stark wrote:
"Dave Page" writes:
Sure it's trivial in various languages, even in trusted PL/Tcl:
CREATE FUNCTION sleep(integer) RETURNS void AS $$
after [expr $1 * 1000]
$$ LANGUAGE pltcl STRICT;
Do any of the trusted languages count branches and abort after some large
numbe
pgman wrote:
> Is enable_constraint_exclusion the proper name for this feature? I know
> we have enable* in the optimizer settings, but that naming seems
> unfortunate in that we should have just called it hash_join and it could
> be enabled/disabled.
>
> I am thinking we should just call it cons
"Dave Page" writes:
> Sure it's trivial in various languages, even in trusted PL/Tcl:
>
> CREATE FUNCTION sleep(integer) RETURNS void AS $$
> after [expr $1 * 1000]
> $$ LANGUAGE pltcl STRICT;
Do any of the trusted languages count branches and abort after some large
number to prevent trusted c
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 08:14, John DeSoi wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>
> > To others who've written their own sleep() function: what are you
> > using it for?
>
>
> I need it for API and user interface testing. I want to be sure
> things behave correctly when a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> In any case, I wonder how many people, not having a sleep() function,
> effect a delay with a busy loop; an example of such has been posted
> in response to the thread in pgsql-admin, and didn't the regression
> tests do so until recently? That se
--On måndag, augusti 22, 2005 10.12.11 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wrote:
How is FreeBSD's Unicode support broken? I was not aware of that.
FreeBSD has no unicode collation support. Hence the need for ICU.
Well, this obvious
Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> wrote:
>> How is FreeBSD's Unicode support broken? I was not aware of that.
> FreeBSD has no unicode collation support. Hence the need for ICU.
Well, this obviously doesn't bother anyone who uses FreeBSD, so it need
not bother us either. I do not
Michael Adler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:13:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What do people think of exposing pg_usleep() to the user?
> >
> > I'm not real enthused about it. Generally speaking, a sleep() on the
> > database side means you ar
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please try to apply the patch, even if dangling BEGIN WORK; still causes
> problems - I'll fix this tomorrow.
No. A patch that you yourself have so little confidence in, in a
fundamental part of the system?
This will be lucky if it gets into 8.2, afte
--On måndag, augusti 22, 2005 09.19.58 -0400 Bruce Momjian
wrote:
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> I feel it makes sense to apply the smaller patch in any case, so that
> there's a Win32 solution not requiring ICU (ie, I can't see an argument
> for doing (2) rather than (3)).
>
> Comments?
I don't
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:13:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What do people think of exposing pg_usleep() to the user?
>
> I'm not real enthused about it. Generally speaking, a sleep() on the
> database side means you are idling while holding locks, and
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Can someone please try running a build from CVS tip made on a modern box
(W2k3 or XP >= SP1 I believe) on a non-modern box (e.g. W2k) and see if
anything blows up? If it does then we either have to finish this work
now or revert the config file changes, I think.
W2k and
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> > I feel it makes sense to apply the smaller patch in any case, so that
> > there's a Win32 solution not requiring ICU (ie, I can't see an argument
> > for doing (2) rather than (3)).
> >
> > Comments?
>
> I don't mind either way, but while Win32 will work with Magnus' pa
On Aug 22, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
To others who've written their own sleep() function: what are you
using it for?
I need it for API and user interface testing. I want to be sure
things behave correctly when a long running query is interrupted.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pg
On E, 2005-08-22 at 02:14 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Probably nonInVacuumXmin needs more care, i.e. initialising and setting
> it outside GetSnapshotData, at trx start and/or end. I'm too sleepy now
> to investigate further (it's 2:10 am here).
The attached patch works now as advertized so that
In other words ... if you can test this ... HELP!!!
I'll run tests.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
---(end of broadcast)---
--On lördag, augusti 20, 2005 12.17.47 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[ moving to -hackers for wider discussion ]
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00039.php
I've been working with Palles ICU patch to make it wor
On E, 2005-08-22 at 01:14 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > I fixed this in a more local way by adding an extra "xmin" to proc for
> > transactions where inVacuum is false (proc->nonInVacuumXmin) which is
> > calculated together with proc->xmin.
>
> Somehow this still did not fix the issue of getti
On E, 2005-08-22 at 00:36 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On K, 2005-08-17 at 14:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Please check the actual patch and advise if anything is still missing.
> >
> > While testing this I realized that it does not in fact work as
On E, 2005-08-22 at 00:36 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On K, 2005-08-17 at 14:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > That
> > makes the patch far more invasive, and I'm not confident I can work
> > out all the implications. (In particular, the consequences for
> > TransactionIdIsInProgress look bad. I do
-Original Message-
From: "Michael Fuhr"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 22/08/05 05:41:50
To: "Tom Lane"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sleep functions
> To others who've written their own sleep() > function: what are you
> using it for?
LOL - I hon
83 matches
Mail list logo
