As Peter Eisentraut pointed out, we are not on the phase
to discuss about user documentations yet.
It is a reasonable idea to discuss correct specifications
of SE-PostgreSQL from the viewpoint of the developers.
Then, it will the a good source for the upcoming user docs.
For the recent a few
2009/7/31 Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de:
--On Montag, Juli 27, 2009 15:24:12 +0200 Bernd Helmle
maili...@oopsware.de wrote:
Hi,
I sending a little bit modified version - I removed my forgotten
comment in gram.y
Thanks, i'll look on it asap.
Looks good now.
Here is a slightly
2009/7/30 Steve Prentice prent...@cisco.com:
Since I didn't get completely shot out of the water and a couple people
seemed to think it was helpful, I'm submitting this patch for consideration
in the next commitfest.
This patch changes plpgsql IN parameters so they are mutable. Previously,
Nobody may remember, I also proposed a patch to support access
controls on largeobject.
It was suggested that largeobject stores its contents on the TOAST
relations and provides interfaces to read/write them partially.
For example:
== lo_xxx() interfaces ==
A new version of loread() and
Michael Meskes írta:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 03:58:21PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Attached is the short example I can reproduce with.
The version I used was final PostgreSQL 8.4.0, without our
extensions posted already. I added an indication to ecpg_type_name():
[z...@db00
There was a thread some time ago about sorting... it kind of died...
I did some tests on a desktop (Postgres 8.3.7, kubuntu, Core 2 dual core,
4GB RAM, RAID1 of 2 SATA disks)
Quick conclusions :
- grabbing the stuff to sort can be IO bound of course (not here)
- for short strings (average
2009/7/31 Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de:
--On Montag, Juli 27, 2009 15:24:12 +0200 Bernd Helmle
maili...@oopsware.de wrote:
Hi,
I sending a little bit modified version - I removed my forgotten
comment in gram.y
Thanks, i'll look on it asap.
Looks good now.
Here is a slightly
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 14:41, Kevin Fieldkevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 19:52, Kevin Fieldkevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the
patch. In the log, I get:
%t LOG: CreateProcess call failed: A blocking
KaiGai,
* KaiGai Kohei (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
For the recent a few days, I've worked to write and edit
the specification (partially copied from the draft of user
documentation) for the development purpose.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SEPostgreSQL_Development
Thanks for doing
PFC li...@peufeu.com writes:
- for short strings (average 12 bytes), sort is CPU-bound in strcoll()
- for longer strings (average 120 bytes), sort is even more CPU-bound in
strcoll()
No news there. If you are limited by the speed of text comparisons,
consider using C locale.
Hi,
Finally some update on the patch.
Le 18 juil. 09 à 20:55, Robert Haas a écrit :
This is one of the things that I hate about the requirement to post
context diffs: filterdiff, at least for me, strips out the git tags
that indicate the base rev of the patch.
Yes, and as I didn't have the
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Rebased to correct for pg_indent changes.
Thanks for doing that. Attached is a further small improvement that
gets rid of the find_ready_items() scans. After re-reading the patch
I realized that it wasn't *really* avoiding O(N^2) behavior ...
Stephen Frost wrote:
KaiGai,
* KaiGai Kohei (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
For the recent a few days, I've worked to write and edit
the specification (partially copied from the draft of user
documentation) for the development purpose.
I've noticed that every so often eukaryote reports a regression failure
with just this one diff:
***
/data/markwkm/local/pgfarmbuild-cell/HEAD/pgsql.4654/src/test/regress/expected/plpgsql.out
Fri Jul 31 04:00:51 2009
---
On 7/19/2009, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The way that I think this should be approached is
(1) a code-refactoring patch that moves INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE control
into plan nodes; then
(2) a feature patch that makes use of that to expose RETURNING in CTEs.
I've been working on this and
On 7/31/2009, Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
..
I seem to be having problems with my email client. The patch should be
attached this time. Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
patch3
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Rebased to correct for pg_indent changes.
Thanks for doing that.
No problem. I think I still owe you a few. :-)
Attached is a further small improvement that gets rid of the
find_ready_items() scans.
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
But there is one issue; the extra search is always required to send a notify
interrupt. This is because pg_listener doesn't have a backend ID and we
cannot pass it to SendProcSignal. In order to solve this issue, we should
newly add backend ID field
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 19:29, Kevin Fieldkevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
%t LOG: received fast shutdown request
%t LOG: aborting any active transactions
%t LOG: autovacuum launcher shutting down
%t LOG: shutting down
%t LOG: database system is shut down
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 19:52, Kevin Fieldkevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the
patch. In the log, I get:
%t LOG: CreateProcess call failed: A blocking operation was
interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall.
Now,
%t LOG: received fast shutdown request
%t LOG: aborting any active transactions
%t LOG: autovacuum launcher shutting down
%t LOG: shutting down
%t LOG: database system is shut down
That's the entire file. Attempting to start the service, I
almost
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:29:34PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think we've pretty much established that it doesn't make things
*worse*, so I'm sort of inclined to go ahead and apply it. The
theoretical advantage of eliminating O(N^2) search
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
daveg da...@sonic.net writes:
Will the patch apply to a vanilla 8.4.0?
Yeah, it should. The line numbers in the version I just posted might
be off a little bit for 8.4.0, but patch should cope.
Be sure to make clean and recompile all of src/bin/pg_dump, else you
might have some issues.
KaiGai,
* KaiGai Kohei (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Strategy for code changes:
Patch #1: Move permissions checks currently implemented in other parts
of the code (eg: tablecmds.c:ATExecChangeOwner()) into
aclchk.c.
Patch #2:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Andres Freundand...@anarazel.de wrote:
One part where I find the code flow ugly is 'did_boilerplate' in
report_triggers/its callsites.
I can see why it is done that way, but its not exactly obvious to read when
you want to find out how the format looks.
Hi Robert,
On Friday 31 July 2009 23:13:54 Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Andres Freundand...@anarazel.de wrote:
I have posted a new version of this patch on a separate thread; do you
have time to re-review?
Yes, I have seen it. I plan to spent some time on it tonight
On Friday 31 July 2009 23:13:54 Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Andres Freundand...@anarazel.de wrote:
One part where I find the code flow ugly is 'did_boilerplate' in
report_triggers/its callsites.
I can see why it is done that way, but its not exactly obvious to read
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Andres Freundand...@anarazel.de wrote:
I am quite happy that the annoyance over a patch of mine helped you starting
to work on this ;-)
Thanks for all the work.
You're welcome, thanks for all your reviewing. For the record, I
wasn't annoyed BY the patch; I was
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Stephen Frostsfr...@snowman.net wrote:
KaiGai,
* KaiGai Kohei (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Strategy for code changes:
Patch #1: Move permissions checks currently implemented in other parts
of the code (eg:
Stephen Frost wrote:
KaiGai,
* KaiGai Kohei (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Strategy for code changes:
Patch #1: Move permissions checks currently implemented in other parts
of the code (eg: tablecmds.c:ATExecChangeOwner()) into
Robert Haas wrote:
FWIW, pretty much +1 from me on everything in here; I think this is
definitely going in the right direction. It's not the size of the
patches that matter; it's the complexity and difficulty of verifying
that they don't break anything. And it's not cumulative: three easy
KaiGai,
* KaiGai Kohei (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
It seems to me your suggestion is similar to the idea of PGACE framework.
It is, but it's being done as incremental changes to the existing
structures, and working with them, instead of ignoring that they exist.
Let's consider the matter
* KaiGai Kohei (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
As I noted in the reply to Stephen Frost, what should be controled
(e.g, ALTER TABLE) and how to check it (e.g, ownership based control)
are different things.
If we go on the direction to restructure the current aclcheck mechanism
and to integrate
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark
Kirkwoodmar...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
With respect to the sum of wait times being not very granular, yes -
quite
true. I was thinking it is useful to be able to answer the question
'where
is my wait time being
Stephen Frost wrote:
For example:
void pg_security_alter_table(Oid relid)
{
if (!pg_class_ownercheck(relid, GetUserId())
aclcheck_error(...);
if (!sepgsqlCheckTableSetattr(relid))
selinux_error(...);
}
Right, something along these lines, where the
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
regards, tom lane
Awesome, congrats.
...Robert
--
Sent
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Dimitri
Fontainedfonta...@hi-media.com wrote:
I failed to have 0 to allow for analyze to compute a value again, as shown
in the raw notes in attachement:
I'm lost. I think you're getting the new column attdistinct mixed up
with the existing column stadistinct.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Andres Freundand...@anarazel.de wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Friday 31 July 2009 23:13:54 Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Andres Freundand...@anarazel.de wrote:
I have posted a new version of this patch on a separate thread; do you
have time to
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
As for the contrib module, I think it could use a lot more function
header comments! Also, it would be great if it could be used separately
from tsearch, i.e. that it provided a function unaccent(text) returns
text that unaccented arbitrary strings (I guess it would use
40 matches
Mail list logo
