On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 12:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It seems like it would be more helpful if you were working on
implementing a design that had more than one vote. As far as I can
tell, we have rough consensus that for the first commit we should only
worry about the case where k = 1; that
I did a little search and I found that probably there is a library (dll or
lib ???) that contains all these references. I could specify it by using
-L/C/path/to/libraries -libraryname as an option to the second gcc command,
but I have no idea what the library is and where to find it (I used
You need to link to postgres.exe - either directly or by manually
creating an import library.
//Magnus
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:40, Marios Vodas mvo...@gmail.com wrote:
I did a little search and I found that probably there is a library (dll or
lib ???) that contains all these references. I
It is an exe don't I need a dll?
Can you get more specific on either directly or by manually creating an
import library? What I understand by directly is that I should rename
postgres.exe to postgres.dll.
Thank you for responding so quickly.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Magnus Hagander
On 10/08/2010 08:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
I'm finally trying to get current with the switch to git, following this
wiki page:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_with_Git
Specifically, I am trying to do:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.comwrote:
This is a continuation from this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg02153.php
The attached patch allows creating a primary key using an existing index.
I have attached two versions of
On 10/09/2010 02:19 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com
mailto:singh.gurj...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a continuation from this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg02153.php
The attached patch
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the
attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a
horrid inefficiency. Maybe we could restrict it to text attachments
that have a Content-Type with a name attribute
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.frwrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the
attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a
horrid inefficiency. Maybe we
I'm reading this a bit late, but...
We (Xorg) found that ignoring:
*~
*.bak
*.patch
in addition to the files generated by building is very helpful.
We do use git tag and git describe in the make dist process, as
well as git log ChangeLog. That may be relevant; avoiding git
describe's
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com writes:
I'm reading this a bit late, but...
We (Xorg) found that ignoring:
*~
*.bak
*.patch
in addition to the files generated by building is very helpful.
Yeah ... personally I'm ignoring *~ and *.orig. I think that the
consensus among
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
All the build products in a normal build. One of the infelicities of
git is that 'git status' shows the untracked files at the bottom. So
if you have lots of unignored stuff floating around, the information
about
12 matches
Mail list logo
