On 05/30/2011 10:57 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
The case I want to avoid is (a). And if it's possible to make (b) just
be the -hackers mailinglist and putting a keyword in the right place,
Did you mean the -bugs mailing list?
On the subject of keywords, considering Robert's suggestion to
On 05/30/2011 04:26 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
Anyone interested in the tracker, please visit
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TrackerDiscussion and add your
feedback/input.
I think this illustrates exactly what we *don't*
On 24.05.2011 15:22, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
During preparing patch of my GSoC project I found reasonable to
move childoffnum (GISTInsertStack structure) from parent to child. This
means that now child have childoffnum of parent's link to child. It allows
to maintain entire parts of tree in
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
I think we can work around both of those by just saving and restoring
the value of each Param that we set while evaluating an expression,
Huh? That's a waste of time and effort. Just make sure that each such
spot has its own
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:21, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error
for local lines. We'd have to fix initdb to
[The first attempt to send this shows as undeliverable to the list.
Resending for completeness and coherency of archives. Apologies to
those getting duplicates.]
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 26.05.2011 06:19, Kevin Grittner wrote:
/*
* Check whether the writer has become a pivot with an
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:21, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error
for
Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of dom may 29 22:26:21 -0400 2011:
My ideal bug tracker is the debian one which basically stays out of
your way and lets you cc any message to a specific bug at
n...@bugs.debian.org which archives that message in the bug and sends
it to anyone listening to
On 05/29/2011 05:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a list to choose from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue_tracking_systems
I turned this into a spreadsheet to sort and prune more easily; if
anyone wants that let me know, it's not terribly useful beyond what I'm
On sön, 2011-05-29 at 18:36 -0400, Joe Abbate wrote:
I've summarizes the main points made in the recent discussion and did
some minor additional research on the lists suggested by Peter and
Chris Browne. Anyone interested in the tracker, please visit
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:26, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
Anyone interested in the tracker, please visit
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TrackerDiscussion and add your
feedback/input.
I think this illustrates
On sön, 2011-05-29 at 11:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
If it has only a partial view of the set of bugs being worked on, it's
not going to meet the goals that are being claimed for it.
I don't doubt that somebody could run around and link every discussion
about a bug into the tracker. I'm just
On Monday, May 30, 2011 07:30:37 AM Greg Smith wrote:
Trac
While I am not a fan of trac there is a plugin for that that works reasonable
well and isn't that hard to customize if needed:
https://subtrac.sara.nl/oss/email2trac
Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Hi
The in-core XPATH() function currently only handles XPath expressions which
return a node set correctly. For XPath expressions which return boolean,
numeric or string values, XPATH() returns an empty array. (This is the case
for XPath expressions whose top-level syntactic construct isn't a
On 05/27/2011 08:36 AM, MauMau wrote:
I posted a patch for bug #6011 to pgsql-hackers several days ago. How
can I check the status of bug fixes? I'm worried that the patch might
be forgotten, because bug #5842 was missed for two months until Bruce
noticed it.
Discussion here seems to have
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 16:52, Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 05/30/2011 08:45 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
It's fine that a bug tracker *tracks* bugs. It should not control
them. That's not how this community currently works, and a lot of
people have said that's how
On 26.05.2011 06:19, Kevin Grittner wrote:
/*
* Check whether the writer has become a pivot with an out-conflict
* committed transaction, while neither reader nor writer is committed.
If
* the reader is a READ ONLY transaction, there is only a serialization
Hi,
Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX structure.
On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
On inserting some tuple and creating indexes its behaviour is shown below.
1. When there is only one tuple
select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
Anyone interested in the tracker, please visit
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TrackerDiscussion and add your
feedback/input.
I think this illustrates
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 20:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:21, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I
On 30.05.2011 17:10, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 26.05.2011 06:19, Kevin Grittner wrote:
I did some of that in the comments, and I think I understand it
now. See attached patch. Does that look right to you?
! * A serialization failure can only occur if there is a
Hello
I would like to know what is the process to get new applications accepted for
inclusion in the stack builder (namely the eZ Publish cms).
I would be ready spend some time to package the application according to some specific format, and to host the built package on some dedicated server
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
well bugzilla has an inbound email interface as well that can both be
used to creande and to manipulate bugs (as in mails that have the
bug-id in the subject will be added as a comment).
Ugh, putting it in
Hi,
Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX structure.
On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
On inserting some tuple and creating indexes its behaviour is shown below.
1. When there is only one tuple
select
Hi Greg,
On 05/29/2011 10:26 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Joe Abbate j...@freedomcircle.com wrote:
Anyone interested in the tracker, please visit
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TrackerDiscussion and add your
feedback/input.
I think this illustrates exactly what
Hi!
During my work on GSoC project, I found bad perfomace of GiST for point
datatype. It appears even on uniform random data.
test=# create table test as (select point(random(), random()) from
generate_series(1, 100));
SELECT 100
test=# create index test_idx on test using gist(point);
Why is it necessary to replay the operation only on the slave? Can we
just use XLOG_HEAP_NEWPAGE?
Uh, I don't know why but I thought I shouldn't log a page on the master,
since all the pages are already there and fsync-ed. But if it makes no harm,
I can easily use XLOG_HEAP_NEWPAGE (of
On 26.05.2011 00:31, Tom Lane wrote:
The main annoyance here is that standalone expressions may now need
Param slots to execute, which will complicate places that need to
evaluate them, but there's probably no way around that
Yeah, I can see two complications:
1. Domain constraints
Domain
Hi Magnus,
On 05/30/2011 08:45 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
It's fine that a bug tracker *tracks* bugs. It should not control
them. That's not how this community currently works, and a lot of
people have said that's how they want it to stay (at least for now).
If I may belabor the point, what
I've applied patches to fix Martin Pitt's report of peer auth failing on
FreeBSD-amd64 kernels. I tested it with FreeBSD but do not have the
resources to check every other platform that uses the same code branch
in auth_peer. The buildfarm will soon tell us if the patches fail to
compile
On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2011-05-29 at 18:36 -0400, Joe Abbate wrote:
I've summarizes the main points made in the recent discussion and did
some minor additional research on the lists suggested by Peter and
Chris Browne. Anyone interested in
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2011-05-29 at 18:36 -0400, Joe Abbate wrote:
I've summarizes the main points made in the recent discussion and did
some minor additional
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
I don't think it is *necessary*. If we're replaying WAL on a master, we'll
also
be resetting unlogged relations after recovery; what we write or do not write
to
them in the mean time has no functional impact. Seemed like
On 31 May 2011 11:52, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used RT and I found that the
web interface was both difficult to use and unwieldly for tickets
containing large numbers of messages.
A big loud ditto from me on this point.
Cheers,
BJ
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com writes:
On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Based on that, and past discussions, and things we've tried in the past,
and gut feeling, and so on, it looks like Request Tracker would appear
to be the next best thing to consider
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:52:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2011-05-30 4:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2011-05-29 at 18:36 -0400, Joe Abbate wrote:
I've summarizes the main points
I wrote:
I've applied patches to fix Martin Pitt's report of peer auth failing on
FreeBSD-amd64 kernels. I tested it with FreeBSD but do not have the
resources to check every other platform that uses the same code branch
in auth_peer. The buildfarm will soon tell us if the patches fail to
On 05/30/2011 09:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I have used RT and I found that the
web interface was both difficult to use and unwieldly for tickets
containing large numbers of messages. Maybe those those things have
been improved, but frankly if RT or Bugzilla is the best we can come
up with
On 2011-05-30 04:26, Greg Stark wrote:
My biggest gripe about bugzilla was that it sent you an email with updates to
the bug but you couldn't respond to that email.
Just checked bugzilla's list of features and they *now* lists that as supported:
File/Modify Bugs By Email
In addition to the
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The number of people reading and replying to
emails on pgsql-bugs is already insufficient, perhaps because of the
(incorrect) perception that Tom does or will fix everything and no one
else needs to care. So anything
Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org writes:
bookstor=# SELECT 1 FROM core_wot_seq FOR UPDATE;
Um ... why are you doing that on a sequence?
ERROR: could not access status of transaction 1573786613
DETAIL: Could not open file pg_clog/05DC: No such file or directory.
This doesn't surprise me too
Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk writes:
On 2011-05-30 04:26, Greg Stark wrote:
My biggest gripe about bugzilla was that it sent you an email with updates
to the bug but you couldn't respond to that email.
Just checked bugzilla's list of features and they *now* lists that as
I don't much like that approach. The standby would need to be able to
write the backup history file to the archive at the end of backup, and
we'd have to reintroduce the code to fetch it from archive and, when
streaming, from the master. At the moment, the archiver doesn't even run
in the
On 05/31/2011 05:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk writes:
On 2011-05-30 04:26, Greg Stark wrote:
My biggest gripe about bugzilla was that it sent you an email with updates
to the bug but you couldn't respond to that email.
Just checked bugzilla's list of
44 matches
Mail list logo
