Tom Lane wrote:
In fdwhandler.sgml, chapter fdwhandler has only one subsection
(fdw-routines).
If there is only one subsection, no table of contents is generated
in
the chapter.
[...]
I don't know how to change the doc toolchain to do that either. But
on reflection it seemed to me that
Hello.
Any news on these issues? Becuase beta3 is scheduled for July 11th...
You wrote:
MM On Jun 6
MM (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-06/msg00272.php),
MM Pavel discovered an issue with PQsetvalue that could cause libpq to
MM wander off into unallocated memory that was
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
1. De-archive the file to RECOVERYXLOG
2. If RECOVERYXLOG is valid, remove a pre-existing one and rename
RECOVERYXLOG to the correct name
3. Replay the file with the correct name
Yes please, that makes sense.
Will
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
What about outputing something like the following message in that case?
if (walsender receives SIGUSR2)
ereport(LOG, terminating walsender process due to
administrator command);
...which doesn't explain the
(2011/06/02 17:39), Pavel Stehule wrote:
This patch enhances a GET DIAGNOSTICS statement functionality. It adds
a possibility of access to exception's data. These data are stored on
stack when exception's handler is activated - and these data are
access-able everywhere inside handler. It has a
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
1. De-archive the file to RECOVERYXLOG
2. If RECOVERYXLOG is valid, remove a pre-existing one and rename
RECOVERYXLOG to the correct name
3.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 17:29, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
About half of our code prints GetLastError() using %d after casting it
to int (actually, about half of that half uses %i, another thing to sort
out, perhaps), and the other half uses %lu without casting. I gather
from
Yeah, I noticed that myself recently.
On 6 July 2011 12:48, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Nope. I think it's only in there because of lazyness, in general. %lu
seems to be the correct choice.
Yes, it's the correct choice.
Thirdly, why are we not trying to print a textual
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
1. De-archive the file to RECOVERYXLOG
2. If RECOVERYXLOG is valid, remove
On 6/07/2011 2:15 AM, Brar Piening wrote:
I've replied on-list see:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg00066.php
Ah, sorry I missed that. I generally can't keep up with -hackers and
have to rely on being cc'd.
The patch (VS2010v7.patch) seems to mix significant
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 13:06 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
It would be something like: range_co(1,8)::int8range
(just so we're comparing apples to apples)
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On first blush, that looks a whole lot cleaner. I'll try to find some
time for a more detailed review soon.
This seems not to compile for me:
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
Hi,
On May 27, 2011, at 11:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
One of our customers is interested in being able to store original
timezone along with a certain timestamp.
It is currently possible to store a TZ in a separate column, but this is
a bit wasteful and not very convenient anyway.
When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
postgresql git repository around for a while, for people who had
clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current
git repository when it comes to
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:59:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 5/07/2011 9:05 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 15:02, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
I asked about crash reports becaus of
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Attached an updated patch.
If you find it ready for
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
postgresql git repository around for a while, for people who had
clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
cvs while we were using
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 09:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
There's some slight ugliness around the NULL/infinity business, but I
think that I could be convinced. I'd like to avoid confusion between
NULL and infinity if possible.
I was thinking that if you passed 'i' for one of the bounds, it
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
The attached patch is rebased one to consolidate routines to remove objects
using the revised get_object_address().
The new RemoveObjects() replaces the following routines; having
similar structure.
- RemoveRelations
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
To get into some more details: how exactly would this constructor be
generated on the fly? Clearly we want only one underlying C function
that accepts something like:
range_internal(lower, upper, flags, Oid rangetype)
So
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Gurjeet Singh
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 12:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
To get into some more details: how exactly would this constructor be
generated on the fly? Clearly we want only one underlying C function
that accepts something like:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jul 06 12:40:39 -0400 2011:
This patch removes an impressive amount of boilerplate code and
replaces it with something much more compact. I like that. In the
interest of full disclosure, I suggested this approach to KaiGai at
PGCon, so I'm biased:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jul 06 12:40:39 -0400 2011:
This patch removes an impressive amount of boilerplate code and
replaces it with something much more compact. I like that. In the
interest
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 19:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm really hurting
for is some code review.
I'm trying to get my head into this patch. I have a couple questions:
Does this happen to be based on some academic research? I don't
necessarily expect it to be; just thought I'd ask.
Here is my
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 09:55:01AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On first blush, that looks a whole lot cleaner. ?I'll try to find some
time for a more detailed review soon.
This seems not to compile for me:
gcc -O2
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:31:53PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
postgresql git repository around for a while, for people who had
clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
cvs while we were using cvs, and
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:44:35PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
So I was the victim assigned to review this patch.
Thanks for doing so.
This discussion seems to have died off. Let's see if we can drive
this forward to some
Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes:
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 12:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
To get into some more details: how exactly would this constructor be
generated on the fly? Clearly we want only one underlying C
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 19:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm really hurting
for is some code review.
I'm trying to get my head into this patch. I have a couple questions:
Does this happen to be based on some academic research?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Review of VS 2010 support patches
From: Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au
To: Brar Piening b...@gmx.de
Date: 06.07.2011 14:56
It turns out that VS2010v8.patch is also attached to the same message.
Not that you'd know it from the
On 07/06/2011 04:41 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
I certainly could. But as those files are Andrew's work which isn't
really related to VS2010 build and could as well be commited
seperately I don't want to take credit for it.
I'll remove my versions from the patch (v9 probably) if those files
get
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jul 06 14:02:13 -0400 2011:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jul 06 12:40:39 -0400 2011:
This patch removes an impressive amount of boilerplate code and
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:06:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:44:35PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
So I was the victim assigned to review this patch.
Thanks for doing so.
This discussion seems
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 16:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
postgresql git repository around for a while, for people who had
clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
cvs while we were using cvs, and does
On 6/07/2011 11:00 PM, Radosław Smogura wrote:
I think IPC for fast shout down all backends and wait for report
processing is quite enaugh.
How do you propose to make that reliable, though?
--
Craig Ringer
POST Newspapers
276 Onslow Rd, Shenton Park
Ph: 08 9381 3088 Fax: 08 9388 2258
ABN:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:25:12PM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
*** a/src/backend/commands/view.c
--- b/src/backend/commands/view.c
--- 227,257
atcmd-def = (Node *) lfirst(c);
atcmds = lappend(atcmds, atcmd);
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Noah Misch n...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Maybe this is a stupid idea, but what about changing the logic so
that, if we get back InvalidOid, we AcceptInvalidationMessages() and
retry if the counter has advanced? ISTM that might cover the example
you mentioned in
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jul 06 14:02:13 -0400 2011:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jul 06 12:40:39
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jun12, 2011, at 23:39 , Robert Haas wrote:
So, the majority (60%) of the excess spinning appears to be due to
SInvalReadLock. A good chunk are due
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 08:35:55PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Noah Misch n...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
While a mere LOCK bar.x is sufficient to get a clean cutover with respect
to
parsing, it fails to invalidate plans. To really cover all bases, you need
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 15:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I ran into problems with that before... I think with the I/O functions.
I don't think that's a problem here, but I thought I'd ask.
I think it'd probably be all right to do that. The places where you
might find shortcuts being taken are
Hackers,
Commitfest 2 continues to progress ... slowly. At this point, we have
no hope of wrapping it up early; my best hope is to at least finish on time.
Statistics:
* 1/2 of patches are still pending development: 12 waiting on author,
and 18 waiting for review. In addition, 7 patches are
pg_upgrade's pg_scandir_internal() makes use of the non-standard %m
format:
pg_log(PG_FATAL, could not open directory \%s\: %m\n, dirname);
Is this an oversight, or is there an undocumented assumption that this
code will only be used on platforms where %m works?
(Which platforms don't have
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
pg_upgrade's pg_scandir_internal() makes use of the non-standard %m
format:
pg_log(PG_FATAL, could not open directory \%s\: %m\n, dirname);
Is this an oversight, or is there an undocumented assumption that this
code will only be used on platforms
46 matches
Mail list logo
