On 23 December 2012 18:49, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Anyway, hope you can make call on 28th so we can discuss this and
agree a way forwards you're happy with.
Stephen, KaiGai and myself met by phone on 28th to discuss.
1. The actual default is not that important to any of us.
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
A result from ours previous talk was a completely disabling mixing
positional and ordered placeholders - like is requested by man and gcc
raises warnings there.
But mixing is not explicitly disallowed in doc, and mixing was tested
in
2012/12/31 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
A result from ours previous talk was a completely disabling mixing
positional and ordered placeholders - like is requested by man and gcc
raises warnings there.
But mixing is not explicitly
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Hi,
Today, I tried to make fun with the new background worker processes in
9.3, but I found something disturbing, and need help to go further.
Thanks.
Is it the work of the function (pointed by bgw_sighup) to get the new
config values from the postmaster? and if
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
On the whole I think this is a must fix bug, so we don't have a lot of
choice, unless someone has a proposal for a different and more compact
way of solving the problem.
The only more compact way of handling things that I can
Greg Stark st...@mit.edu writes:
I do wonder whether the SQL standard will do something obtuse enough
that that's the only option for a large swathe of queries. Or is that
the case already? The query syntax you're using here, is it standard
SQL? Is it widely supported?
Yeah, it's standard ---
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 11:03 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Hi,
Today, I tried to make fun with the new background worker processes in
9.3, but I found something disturbing, and need help to go further.
Thanks.
Is it the work of the function (pointed by
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 11:03 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I think this (have a config option, and have SIGHUP work as expected)
would be useful to demo in worker_spi, if you care to submit a patch.
Yeah, I would love too. Reading the code of worker_spi, we could
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 12:54 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 11:03 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I think this (have a config option, and have SIGHUP work as expected)
would be useful to demo in worker_spi, if you care to submit a patch.
On 30.12.2012 04:03, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Attached is a patch with fixed handling of temporary relations. I've
chosen to keep the logic in DropRelFileNodeAllBuffers and rather do a
local copy without the local relations.
This
Hello
2012/12/31 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
A result from ours previous talk was a completely disabling mixing
positional and ordered placeholders - like is requested by man and gcc
raises warnings there.
But mixing is not
Hi Allastair,
On 12/28/2012 02:33:03 PM, Alastair Turner wrote:
Sorry for the slow reply ...
Such is life.
The discussion needs to be a little broader than stdout and stderr,
there are currently three output streams from psql:
- stdout - prompts, not tabular output such as the results
Hello
I am trying simulate hotstandby conflicts on 9.3, but without success.
I have a basic hot standby configuration - on slave just hot_standby
= on, standby_mode = on and primary_conninfo
hot standby node works well - but I would to generate conflict
I create table bubu on master and
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 27.12.2012 22:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Might be cleaner to directly assign the correct value to MaxBackends
above, ie. MaxBackends = MaxConnections + newval + 1 +
GetNumShmemAttachedBgworkers(). With a comment to remind that it
needs
On 12/28/12 5:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
As it happens, I just spent a lot of time today narrowing down yet
another report of a regression in 9.2, when running DBT-2:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2012-11/msg7.php.
It looks like that is also caused by the
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:53:51AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
The only matter still requiring attention is a fix for IsoLocaleName().
Following off-list coordination with Brar, I went about finishing up this
patch. The above problem proved deeper than expected. For Windows Vista,
Microsoft made
16 matches
Mail list logo
