On 01/21/2013 02:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013 3:06 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com
mailto:cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/21/2013 10:03 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/19/2013 04:08 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
However, I am not sure whether Cygwin provides
On 21.01.2013 09:14, Миша Тюрин wrote:
Is there any reason why pg_basebackup has limitation in an online backup from the
standby: The backup history file is not created in the database cluster backed
up. ?
WAL archiving isn't active in a standby, so even if it created a backup
history
On 1/20/13 10:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Great catch, will commit. (But first I'm looking through commit
2594cf0e to see if I made the same mistake anywhere else :-(.)
How did you find that, coverity or some such tool?
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
It was found using a homemade static
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 12:49 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
At the minimum your patch will need to have one additional buffer
pinned for every K 8192 * 8 heap pages.
I assume it's the same K I referred to when responding to Robert: the
max number of heap buffers we read before we unpin and repin
On 01/01/2013 10:54 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:53:51AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
The only matter still requiring attention is a fix for IsoLocaleName().
Following off-list coordination with Brar, I went about finishing up this
patch. The above problem proved deeper than
On 21.01.2013 11:10, Jeff Davis wrote:
That confuses me. The testing was to show it didn't hurt other workloads
(like scans or inserts/updates/deletes); so the best possible result is
that they don't show signs either way.
I went back to look at the initial test results that demonstrated that
On 12/09/2012 04:05 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, I will be posting pg_upgrade performance numbers using Unix
processes. I will try to get the Windows code working but will also
need help.
I'm interested ... or at least willing to help ... re the Windows side.
Let me know if I can be of any
On 19.01.2013 14:26, Amit kapila wrote:
On Friday, January 18, 2013 5:27 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Indeed, looking at the pg_xlog, it's not there (I did a couple of extra
timeline switches:
~/pgsql.master$ ls -l data-master/pg_xlog/
total 131084
-rw--- 1 heikki heikki 16777216 Jan
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:32:37PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/01/2013 10:54 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
Tester warning: if you currently have some form of VS2010 installed,
including
the compilers of Windows SDK 7.1, beware of this problem:
On 01/21/2013 07:23 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
What fun. Thanks for working that out.
It's made even more fun by Microsoft's answer to how do I
silent-install the VS 2012 SP1 compiler update - you don't.
Yeah, it's great.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/21/2013 02:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013 3:06 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com
mailto:cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/21/2013 10:03 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/19/2013 04:08
On 01/21/2013 04:32 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/01/2013 10:54 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:53:51AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
The only matter still requiring attention is a fix for IsoLocaleName().
Following off-list coordination with Brar, I went about finishing up this
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:02 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 07.01.2013 16:23, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Since my other patch against pg_basebackup is now committed,
this patch doesn't apply cleanly, patch
On 01/21/2013 06:02 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 12/09/2012 04:05 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
FYI, I will be posting pg_upgrade performance numbers using Unix
processes. I will try to get the Windows code working but will also
need help.
I'm interested ... or at least willing to help ... re the
On 01/21/2013 07:05 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
No, I only use the client. But then I support plenty of things I don't use.
Oh, I somehow thought you were. And yes, we all support things we
don't use - but it certainly helps if there is *someone* out there who
uses it. Having a buildfarm animal
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:01:29AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
I've found EC2 to be unusably slow for Windows builds, with a medium
instance taking an hour and a half to do a simple build and vcregress
check. They're also restrictive in disk space terms, so you land up
needing to add a second
Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As submitted, this broke pg_dump for dumping from pre-8.0 servers.
(7.4 didn't accept commas in SET TRANSACTION syntax, and versions
before that didn't have the READ ONLY option
On 01/21/2013 08:55 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:01:29AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
I've found EC2 to be unusably slow for Windows builds, with a medium
instance taking an hour and a half to do a simple build and vcregress
check. They're also restrictive in disk space
Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes:
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 00:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I looked at this patch. ISTM we should not have the option at all but
just do it always. I cannot believe that always-go-left is ever a
preferable strategy in the long run; the resulting imbalance in the
On 01/21/2013 08:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/21/2013 04:32 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/01/2013 10:54 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:53:51AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
The only matter still requiring attention is a fix for
IsoLocaleName().
Following off-list
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:23:21AM +, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 19 January 2013 20:38, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
staticloud.com seems to be gone. Would you repost these?
I've pushed these to a git repo, hosted on github.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/21/2013 08:55 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:01:29AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
I've found EC2 to be unusably slow for Windows builds, with a medium
instance taking an hour and a half to do a
On 21.01.2013 15:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Davispg...@j-davis.com writes:
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 00:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I looked at this patch. ISTM we should not have the option at all but
just do it always. I cannot believe that always-go-left is ever a
preferable strategy in the long
On 01/21/2013 08:11 AM, Dave Page wrote:
I was never able to determine why the Windows instances were so much
slower than the corresponding Linux instance of the same type.
Full vs. para-virtualisation perhaps?
No, Windows builds just are slower. For some time the buildfarm has been
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/21/2013 08:11 AM, Dave Page wrote:
I was never able to determine why the Windows instances were so much
slower than the corresponding Linux instance of the same type.
Full vs. para-virtualisation perhaps?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/21/2013 08:11 AM, Dave Page wrote:
I was never able to determine why the Windows instances were so much
slower than the corresponding Linux
On 18.01.2013 13:57, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
When a standby starts up, and catches up with the master through the
archive, it copies the target timeline's history file from the archive
to pg_xlog. That's enough for that standby's purposes, but if there is a
cascading standby or pg_receivexlog
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:14:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Can someone comment on the attached patch? pg_upgrade was testing if
system() returned a non-zero value, while I am thinking I should be
adjusting system()'s return value with WEXITSTATUS().
On 21 January 2013 13:10, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
What filesystem did you use for testing? Would you also provide /proc/cpuinfo
or a rough description of the system's CPUs?
Unfortunately, I don't have access to that server at the moment. It's
under Greg Smith's control. I believe
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As submitted, this broke pg_dump for dumping from pre-8.0 servers.
(7.4 didn't accept commas in SET
Tom Lane escribió:
Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp writes:
About ALTER FUNCTION towards aggregate function, why we should raise
an error strictly?
I agree we probably shouldn't --- traditionally we have allowed that,
AFAIR, so changing it would break existing applications for little
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
+1
Is there more work being done on this, or is the current patch ready to review?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 18.01.2013 06:38, Phil Sorber wrote:
Is it possible to re-use walreceiver code from the backend?
I was thinking that it would actually be very useful to have the whole
replication functionality modularized
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 10:50 AM Amit kapila wrote:
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 4:04 AM Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
2013/1/18 Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com:
Please find the rebased Patch for Compute MAX LSN.
The function 'remove_parent_refernces' couldn't be called
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
There has been discussion in the past of removing or significantly
changing the way streaming replication/point-in-time-recovery (PITR) is
setup in Postgres. Currently the file recovery.conf is used, but that
was designed
On 13-01-21 02:28 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
I haven't removed it from the patch afaik, so it would be great to get a
profile here! Its only for xlogdump, but that tool helped me immensely
and I don't want to maintain it independently...
Here is the output from tprof
Here is the baseline:
On 2013-01-21 11:59:18 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
On 13-01-21 02:28 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
I haven't removed it from the patch afaik, so it would be great to get a
profile here! Its only for xlogdump, but that tool helped me immensely
and I don't want to maintain it independently...
Here
Changing up the subject line because this is no longer a work in
progress nor is it pg_ping anymore.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/21/2013 11:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
Ok. I
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Ok. Will prepare a non controversial patch for ddl_command_end.
Thanks. I will make a forceful effort to review that in a timely
fashion when it's posted.
Please find it attached to this email.
COLUMNS=72 git diff --stat
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com wrote:
postgres=# select * from test_0_col_table ;
--
(20 rows)
Interestingly, PostgreSQL 9.2 has regressed here. Not sure if we care,
but worth mentioning:
psql (9.2.2)
test=# select count(*) from foo1;
count
Hello
2013/1/19 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2013/1/18 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
The approach is also inherently seriously inefficient. ...
What is important - for this use case - there is simple and perfect
possible optimization - in this
On 01/21/2013 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As submitted, this broke pg_dump for dumping from pre-8.0 servers.
(7.4 didn't accept commas in SET TRANSACTION syntax, and versions
Attached is a patch that adds a note about the FATAL messages that
appear in the logs if you don't pass a valid user or dbname to PQping
or PQpingParams.
This was requested in the pg_isready thread.
libpq_pqping_doc.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
IMHO that's the single most important task of a review.
Really? I'd say the most important task for a review is does the patch
do what it says it does?. That is, if the patch is supposed to
implement feature X, does it actually? If it's a performance patch,
does performance actually improve?
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
IMHO that's the single most important task of a review.
Really? I'd say the most important task for a review is does the patch
do what it says it does?. That is, if the patch is supposed to
implement feature X, does it actually? If it's a performance
But even before that, you have to ask whether what it's supposed to do
is something we want.
The reviewer can't usually answer that though.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org writes:
Interestingly, PostgreSQL 9.2 has regressed here. Not sure if we care,
but worth mentioning:
Regressed? The output looks the same to me as it has for some time.
test=# select * from foo1;
(No rows)
Time: 1012.567 ms
How did you get that? I don't
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
But even before that, you have to ask whether what it's supposed to do
is something we want.
The reviewer can't usually answer that though.
They can answer whether THEY want it, though. And Tom, Andrew, and I
all just got
Stefan Kaltenbrunner ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc writes:
On 01/21/2013 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
(It's entirely likely that the 7.0 server I keep around for testing this
is the last one in captivity anywhere. But IIRC, we've heard fairly
recent reports of people still using 7.2. We'd have to
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
test=# select * from foo1;
(No rows)
Time: 1012.567 ms
How did you get that? I don't believe it's possible in the default
output format.
Oh I see, it's because I have \x auto in my .psqlrc. If I set \x auto
or \x on then
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
Of course, there is an argument that this patch will
simplify the code, but I'm not sure if its enough to justify the
additional contention which may or may not show up in the benchmarks
we are running, but we know its
On 13-01-21 12:15 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-01-21 11:59:18 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
On 13-01-21 02:28 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
I haven't removed it from the patch afaik, so it would be great to get a
profile here! Its only for xlogdump, but that tool helped me immensely
and I don't
This patch was in Needs Review status, but you committed it on 2013-01-17. I
have marked it as such in the CF app.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
As a junior reviewer, I'd like to know if my main task should be to decide
between 1) writing a review convincing you or Tom that your judgement is
hasty, or 2) to convince the
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Please find it attached to this email.
Nice clean patch, thanks!
Committed, after tinkering with the CommandCounterIncrement() stuff a bit.
I will respond to the rest of your email later. Reading through this
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Here's a breakdown based purely on the names from the CF page (i.e. I
didn't check archives to see who actually posted reviews, and didn't
take into account reviews posted without updating the CF page).
FWIW, I
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
There has been discussion in the past of removing or significantly
changing the way streaming replication/point-in-time-recovery (PITR) is
setup in
A user reported an interesting issue today. After restoring a dump created
with --clean on a running application in his development environment his
application started complaining of missing tables despite those tables very
clearly existing.
After a little thinking, we determined that this was
2013/1/21 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
Another thing is that we might want to document that if a command
errors out, ddl_command_end will never be reached; and perhaps also
that if ddl_command_start errors out, the command itself will never be
reached. Perhaps this is so obvious as to
Peter van Hardenberg p...@pvh.ca writes:
A user reported an interesting issue today. After restoring a dump created
with --clean on a running application in his development environment his
application started complaining of missing tables despite those tables very
clearly existing.
After a
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
Hmm, so it's the same issue I thought I fixed yesterday. My patch only
fixed it for the case that the timeline switch is in the first page of the
segment. When it's not, you still get two calls for a WAL
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Hmm, so it's the same issue I thought I fixed yesterday. My patch only
fixed it for the case that the timeline switch is in
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that is one of the most important patches in the list, and I could put
some effort in it for either review or coding.
I think it would be great if you could elaborate on your reasons for
feeling that this
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Here's a breakdown based purely on the names from the CF page (i.e. I
didn't check archives to see who actually posted reviews, and didn't
take
On 22 January 2013 00:00, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Works for me ...
That's what I thought. But looking at RangeVarGetRelidExtended() and
recomputeNamespacePath(), do you suppose that the problem could be
that access privileges used by the app differed for a schema (or, more
accurately,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that is one of the most important patches in the list, and I could
put
some effort in it for either review or coding.
I think
2013/1/21 Peter van Hardenberg p...@pvh.ca:
A user reported an interesting issue today. After restoring a dump created
with --clean on a running application in his development environment his
application started complaining of missing tables despite those tables very
clearly existing.
After
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Advice:You don't do things that way, this way is the only one we
will ever accept, because we've been sweating blood over
the years to get in a position where it now works.
Peter Geoghegan peter.geoghega...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 January 2013 00:00, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Works for me ...
That's what I thought. But looking at RangeVarGetRelidExtended() and
recomputeNamespacePath(), do you suppose that the problem could be
that access privileges
Robert,
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28927.1236820...@sss.pgh.pa.us
That's not a positive review, but when it comes down to it, it's a
pretty factual email. IMHO, anyway, and YMMV.
Really? I've always thought that was a pretty constructive review. It
certainly gave me the laundry
Hi, Magnus, Josh, Michael, Craig
Thank you for comments and registring to CommitFest.
I made a patch to divide privileges for replication role.
Currently(9.2), the privilege for replication role is
true / false which means that standby server is able to
connect to another server or not with
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
What I don't like is when I
(or anyone) posts a patch and somebody says something that boils down
to no one wants that. *That* ticks me off. Because you know what?
At a minimum, *I* want that. If I didn't, I wouldn't
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
My own experience is different from yours, I guess. I actually like
it when I post a patch, or suggest a concept, and Tom fires back with
a laundry list of reasons it won't work.
This can be a problem with new submitters,
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
so here is rewritten patch
I've applied the infrastructure parts of this, but not the changes
to format() and concat().
Why are the format and concat patches so randomly different?
Not only is the internal implementation completely different for no
Tomonari Katsumata t.katsumata1...@gmail.com writes:
Why is it better to do this with a privilege, rather than just using
pg_hba.conf?
You are right.
Handling with pg_hba.conf is an easy way.
But I think many users think about switch over, so
the pg_hba.conf is same on master and standby.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28927.1236820...@sss.pgh.pa.us
That's not a positive review, but when it comes down to it, it's a
pretty factual email. IMHO, anyway, and YMMV.
Really? I've always thought that was a
I'd like to rework on this optimization and submit a patch at the next CF. Is
that okay?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From: Craig Ringer [mailto:cr...@2ndquadrant.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:30 PM
To: Alexander Korotkov
Cc: Tom Lane; Etsuro Fujita; pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
My own experience is different from yours, I guess. I actually like
it when I post a patch, or suggest a concept, and Tom fires back with
a laundry list of
Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.com writes:
For me our reluctance for any kind of change is a major demoralizing
factor.
I hardly think we're reluctant for any kind of change --- the rate of
commits belies that. What we want is a convincing case that a proposed
change is an improvement
On Monday, January 21, 2013 6:22 PM Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:02 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 07.01.2013 16:23, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Since my other patch against pg_basebackup is now
On 01/22/2013 01:24 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
I'd like to rework on this optimization and submit a patch at the next
CF. Is that okay?
That sounds very sensible to me, given how busy CF2013-01 is and the
remaining time before 9.3.
--
Craig Ringer
Hm - I'm still able to recreate the test the user's running using
pg_dump/pg_restore. I'm still working to see if I can minimize the
test-case, but this is against 9.2.2. Would you prefer I test against HEAD?
regression=# create table z1 (f1 int);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# prepare sz1 as select *
Okay - I've narrowed it down to an interaction with schema recreation.
Here's a minimal test-case I created by paring back the restore from the
pg_restore output until I only had the essence remaining:
-- setup
drop table z1;
create table z1 (f1 int);
insert into z1 values (1);
prepare sz1 as
Peter van Hardenberg p...@pvh.ca writes:
Okay - I've narrowed it down to an interaction with schema recreation.
Here's a minimal test-case I created by paring back the restore from the
pg_restore output until I only had the essence remaining:
Hm ... I'm too tired to trace through the code to
On Jan 22, 2013 1:31 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Here's a breakdown based purely on the names from the CF page (i.e. I
didn't
85 matches
Mail list logo
