On 2013-02-08 15:15, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Revised patch attached. The problem also existed with the get*_as_text
functions (and their operators). Some additional regression tests are
added to test these cases.
Hi,
I did some minor things with the patch today.
1. thanks for the work on
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Magnus Hagander escribió:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan
peter.geoghega...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 February 2013 15:24, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
It's in your personal majordomo
2013/2/10 Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com:
On 9 February 2013 18:30, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a new question
what should be result of
format(%2$*1$s, NULL, hello)
???
My first thought is that a NULL width should be treated the same as no
width at all
On 02/10/2013 05:43 AM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On 2013-02-08 15:15, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Revised patch attached. The problem also existed with the
get*_as_text functions (and their operators). Some additional
regression tests are added to test these cases.
Hi,
I did some minor things with
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCall nodes, which
I'd like to expand centrally rather than in each of the 37 (or 38, but
I only redid 37) places where it's called. The
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:09:19AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCall nodes, which
I'd like to expand centrally rather than in each of the 37
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Through the work on the patch [1], I had a question about the psql \copy
command. We are permitted 1) but not permitted 2):
1) \copy foo from stdin ;
2) \copy foo from stdin;
Is this intentional? I think it
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Ivan Lezhnjov IV i...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to submit the following patch that extends backup.sgml with a bit of
practical but important information.
Project: postgresql
Patch filename: backup.sgml-cmd-v001.patch
The patch extends
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:00:01AM +0400, Alexander Law wrote:
30.01.2013 05:51, Noah Misch wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:54:04AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Alexander Law exclus...@gmail.com writes:
Please look at the following l10n bug:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
No maybe. But I think that all the client commands should follow the
same rule. Otherwise a user would get confused when specifying
options.
I would
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a
bit hard on plain text dumps to me.
Agreed. I don't know how many times I've piped the output of
pg_dump to the input of psql. Certainly that was very common
before pg_upgrade was
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a bit
hard on plain text dumps to me.
I wasn't terribly thrilled with labeling pg_dumpall deprecated,
either. It might be imperfect for some use cases, but that adjective
suggests that
While looking at some proposed patches and pondering some questions on
performance, I realized I desperately needed ways to run benchmarks with
different settings without needing to edit postgresql.conf and
restart/reload the server each time.
Most commonly, I want to run with synchronous_commit
On 10 February 2013 23:27, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
While looking at some proposed patches and pondering some questions on
performance, I realized I desperately needed ways to run benchmarks with
different settings without needing to edit postgresql.conf and
restart/reload the
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
Following some actual testing, I see that we treat postgresql.conf values as
byte sequences; any reinterpretation as encoded text happens later. Hence,
contrary to my earlier suspicion, your patch does not make that situation
worse. The present situation
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
In Czech discussion group was reported performance regression of CTE
query. I wrote a test, when I can show it.
I don't see anything tremendously wrong here. The older branches are
choosing the right plan for entirely wrong reasons: they don't
Hi PostgreSQL hackers,
I often need to calculate time to spend for index creation and vacuum
to analyze PostgreSQL data load performance. Index creation and vacuum
will take non trivial time for large scale data and it is important
information of data loading benchmark.
So I would like to
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Euler Taveira eu...@timbira.com wrote:
On 09-02-2013 13:45, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
BTW, I hope I understand what selfcopy is: send a copy to yourself. Why
would
that be turned on by default?
If you want to reply to yourself...
Wouldn't I be using the copy
Magnus Hagander escribió:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I changed the defaults for new subscribers, and also the flags values
for all existing subscribers, note.
For *all* existing subscribers, or those that had not changed their
2013/2/11 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
In Czech discussion group was reported performance regression of CTE
query. I wrote a test, when I can show it.
I don't see anything tremendously wrong here. The older branches are
choosing the right plan
no, there is strange estimation
- Seq Scan on public.x2 (cost=0.00..345560.00 rows=500
width=4) (actual time=17.914..9330.645 rows=133 loops=1)
Output: x2.a
Filter: (NOT (SubPlan 2))
Rows Removed by Filter: 867
SubPlan
Hi,
Any review comments on this ?
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jeevan Chalke
jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi Heikki,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 23.01.2013 17:30, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:04
22 matches
Mail list logo
