On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2014-05-05 13:52:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Today, I discovered that when building a btree index, the btree code
uses index_form_tuple()
On 2014-05-30 10:30:42 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Hi,
Since a64ca63e59c11d8fe6db24eee3d82b61db7c2c83 pg_sleep() uses
WaitLatch() to wait. That's fine in itself. But
procsignal_sigusr1_handler, which is used
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Marc Mamin m.ma...@intershop.de wrote:
I have patched intarray with 3 additional functions in order to
count[distinct] event IDs
into arrays, whereas the array position correspond to the integer values.
(mimic column oriented storage)
I didn't look at the
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Marc Mamin m.ma...@intershop.de wrote:
I have patched intarray with 3 additional functions in order to
count[distinct] event IDs
into arrays, whereas the array position correspond to the integer values.
(mimic column oriented storage)
I didn't look at the
Hi,
While hacking away at implementing join removal support for ANTI-JOINs I
realised that I couldn't just replace the join with a WHERE false
condition... Let me explain...
With a query such as:
SELECT * FROM a WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM b WHERE a.b_id = b.id);
Where a.b_id has a foreign
On 01-06-2014 02:57, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-06-01 00:50:58 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 5/31/14, 9:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-21 15:14:15 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 2/17/14, 7:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But do you really want to keep that snapshot around long enough to
copy
David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com writes:
I quickly put together the attached patch which adds a knownnotnull bool
field to Var which we can set to true when we're completely sure that the
Var cannot contain any NULL values.
This is utterly the wrong way to go about it. How will you update
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
I am pretty sure by now that the sane fix for this is to add a
SetLatch() call to RecoveryConflictInterrupt(). All the signal handlers
that deal with query cancelation et al. do so, so it seems right that
RecoveryConflictInterrupt() does so as well.
On 6/1/14, 10:49 AM, Euler Taveira wrote:
On 01-06-2014 02:57, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-06-01 00:50:58 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 5/31/14, 9:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-21 15:14:15 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 2/17/14, 7:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But do you really want to keep
Hi all!
I've pushed my report for this week on my repo [0]. Here is a copy!
Attached is the patch containing my work for this week.
Week 2 - 2014/01/01
This week, I have worked on the beginning of the kmedoids module.
Unfortunately, I was supposed to have something working for last Wednesday,
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
On 13.5.2014 20:58, Tom Lane wrote:
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
Yeah, not really what we were shooting for. I've fixed this by
defining the missing locales, and indeed - magpie now fails in
plpython tests.
I saw that earlier today (tho right now the
I wrote:
3. Try to select some more portable non-ASCII character, perhaps U+00A0
(non breaking space) or U+00E1 (a-acute). I think this would probably
work for most encodings but it might still fail in the Far East. Another
objection is that the expected/plpython_unicode.out file would
On 06/01/2014 05:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
3. Try to select some more portable non-ASCII character, perhaps U+00A0
(non breaking space) or U+00E1 (a-acute). I think this would probably
work for most encodings but it might still fail in the Far East. Another
objection is that the
Hi,
Currently the criteria on updating the F/B protocol is undefined. This makes it
hard to update the protocol going forward. It makes it also hard to write
library/driver/application implementations that will be more future proof to
future server versions.
Ideally the documentation for 9.4
On 06/01/2014 03:44 AM, johnlumby wrote:
If you look at the new patch, you'll see that for the different-pid case,
I still call aio_suspend with a timeout.
As you or Claudio pointed out earlier,it could just as well sleep
for the same timeout,
but the small advantage of calling aio_suspend
On 05/30/2014 01:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
If we're going to construct varlena objects inside a StringInfo, maybe
we need a proper API for it. Isn't there a danger that data member of
the StringInfo won't be properly aligned to allow us to do this? In
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2014-05-30 10:30:42 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
Since a64ca63e59c11d8fe6db24eee3d82b61db7c2c83 pg_sleep() uses
WaitLatch() to wait. That's
17 matches
Mail list logo
