Hi
The documentation (or this feature) is broken still
If dbname is NULL or dboid is InvalidOid, the session is not connected to
any particular database, but shared catalogs can be accessed. If username
is NULL or useroid is InvalidOid, the process will run as the superuser
created during
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I am already concerned about some of the commits that have gone in
very recently, particularly these:
There is going to need to be a mop-up period, and we ought to be willing
to
Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr writes:
Another option, breaking backward compatibility, would be to decide
that backslash commands have to be terminated by a semicolon token.
I do not like it much, as it is inconsistent/incompatible with psql.
[...] multi-line SQL queries. If we wanted
Robert, all,
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:07 PM, David Steele da...@pgmasters.net wrote:
The attached v12 patch removes the code that became redundant with
Alvaro committing the event trigger/deparse work. I've updated the
regression tests to
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Fabien COELHO
fabien.coe...@mines-paristech.fr wrote:
I loathe violently the convention of using a backslash at the end of a
line, because it's too easy to write backslash-space-newline or
backslash-tab-newline when you meant to write backslash-newline. But
Hello Robert,
Also, having ; as a end of commands could also help by allowing multiline
commands, but that would break compatibility. Maybe allowing continuations
(\\\n) would be an acceptable compromise.
I loathe violently the convention of using a backslash at the end of a
line, because
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
How about if we simply abort if we find a non-symlink where we want the
symlink to be, and only remove something that is actually a symlink (or
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
At least on dromedary, this seems to be the problem:
pg_audit.c: In function 'stack_pop':
pg_audit.c:387: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument
3 has type 'int64'
pg_audit.c: In function
-hackers,
After my brain flatulence last week on backups, I decided to read the
docs again. There are some improvements that I would like to make and
wanted some feedback:
1. File System Level Backup
The section should be a note within the larger document. It is largely a
legacy section
On 2015-05-14 09:16:10 +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
Andres A rough sketch of what I'm thinking of is:
I'm not sure I'd do it quite like that.
It was meant as a sketch, so there's lots of things it's probably
missing ;)
Rather, have a wrapper function get_outer_tuple that calls
ExecProcNode
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/14/2015 11:59 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Denis Kirjanov k...@itsirius.su wrote:
Is it possible to restrict the trust auth method to accept local
connections only using the selinux policy?
I would guess that it
On 05/14/2015 10:52 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
How about if we simply abort if we find a non-symlink where we want the
symlink to be, and only
On 5/14/15 1:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't think we want to log statements, but we should be able to
log when a job has run and whether it succeeded or not. (log in a
table, not just a logfile).
This isn't something that can be done at higher layers either; only
the
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
Ah, ok.
Pushed that, but some further notes:
Thanks! Looking much better.
* The actual audit reports ought to be ereport() not elog(). I made them
so but did not insert an errcode(). ISTM that it would
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
For the reasons I mentioned, I'd like to get to a point where
subquery_planner's output is Paths not Plans as soon as possible. But the
idea of coarse representation of steps that we
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Denis Kirjanov k...@itsirius.su wrote:
Is it possible to restrict the trust auth method to accept local connections
only using the selinux policy?
I would guess that it probably is, but I can't tell you how.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
In any case, the key question if we're to have Paths representing
higher-level computations is what do we hang our lists of such Paths
off of?.
Yeah, I was wondering about that, too.
If we have say both GROUP BY and LIMIT,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Denis Kirjanov k...@itsirius.su wrote:
Hello guys,
Is it possible to restrict the trust auth method to accept local
connections only using the selinux policy?
You want selinux to prevent trust connections from non-local clients even
if pg_hba.conf explicitly
Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I've pushed a change which should clean it up by simply loading the
module after each reconnects is done, more-or-less simulating having it
be in shared_preload_libraries. It also wasn't using the correct
database for reconnecting.
On 05/14/2015 11:59 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Denis Kirjanov k...@itsirius.su wrote:
Is it possible to restrict the trust auth method to accept local connections
only using the selinux policy?
I would guess that it probably is, but I can't tell you how.
I
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Another thing that looks not amazingly well-thought-out about that
regression test is that it creates a superuser role with a known name
(and no password, not that adding a password would make it better).
We create a lot of
Add backslash continuations to pgbench custom scripts.
The benefit of this approach is that it is upward compatible, and it is
also pretty simple to implement. The downside is that backslash
continuation is not the best syntax ever invented, but then you do not
have to use it if you do not
[...] I tend to agree with the bottom line that that's just more
complication than is justified. I sympathize with Robert's dislike for
backslash continuations; but doing it the other way would be a huge
amount of up-front work and a nontrivial amount of continuing
maintenance, for which we
Hi
I am trying to start bgworker from bgworker and create communication
between these process. I have a code based on test_shm_mq. This code fails
because BackendPidGetProc doesn't find related bgworker process, although
the registrant process is living
registrant =
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Denis Kirjanov k...@itsirius.su wrote:
Yeah, but the idea is to do that without the pg_hba.conf
You may want to try describing the problem and not just ask if the chosen
solution is possible - of which I am doubtful but I have never used selinux
or studied it
The DDL deparse support that just landed looks impressive, but I’ve needed
query deparsing for some time now. Within pg_shard
https://github.com/citusdata/pg_shard we took the fast-and-dirty approach of
merging in a modified ruleutils.c, though I’d (obviously) like to get away from
that.
Many
Yeah, but the idea is to do that without the pg_hba.conf
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: David G. Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com
An: Denis Kirjanov k...@itsirius.su
CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Mai 2015 18:22:45
Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] trust authentication
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/13/2015 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
* Grouping Sets
I had originally promised to be committer for this one, and still want
to go look at it, but Robert's nearby message about not
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to
try because if we lose our reputation for fairness, we have lost a
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:19:44PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I'm just shooting from the hip here, but it seems to me that the
basic pipeline as it exists today is Join - Aggregate - SetOp -
Limit - LockRows. I don't think Limit or LockRows can be moved any
earlier. SetOps have a lot in
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:28:33PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
of that yet, but time grows short, and
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:28:33PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Life is unfair.
True, but I have problems with leaders acting in a way that is unfair to
those with less power. Have you considered how demoralizing it is to
work in an unfair environment? Unfairness happens, but as
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:57:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to
try
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/13/2015 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
* Grouping Sets
I had originally promised to be committer for this one, and still want
to go look at it, but Robert's nearby message about not committing stuff
in haste definitely seems to apply.
That makes
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The good news on this front is that Salesforce has recently taken an
interest in having GROUPING SETS capability, so I should be able to
find more time to work on this over the next month or two.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
of that yet, but time grows
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I'm not sure I understand this issue in detail, but why would using
rmtree() on something you expect to be a symlink ever be a good idea?
It seems like if things are the way you expect them to be, it has no
benefit,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:37:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The good news on this front is that Salesforce has recently taken an
interest in having GROUPING SETS capability, so I should be able to
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:37:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
[ shrug... ] Andrew had unilaterally removed me as committer from that
patch back in January or so, so it dropped way down my priority list.
I'm willing to move it back up now, but I could do
I wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Maybe not, but at the very least we should consider getting it fixed in
9.5 rather than waiting a full development cycle. Same as in
On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
of that yet, but time grows short, and I quite agree with Robert that
committing almost-ready patches at
On 05/15/2015 02:28 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I think this is now ready for committing, but I'm pretty tired now so
I'll read through this one more time in the morning, so that I won't
wake up to a red buildfarm.
Forgot to attach the latest patch, here you go.
- Heikki
From
A possible compromise that we could perhaps still wedge into 9.5 is to
extend CustomPath with a List of child Paths, and CustomScan with a List
of child Plans, which createplan.c would know to build from the Paths,
and other modules would then also be aware of these children. I find that
On 2015-05-13 18:16, Christopher Browne wrote:
On 13 May 2015 at 17:55, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org writes:
Trying to build HEAD and ran into this issue building the docs:
openjade:logicaldecoding.sgml:575:62:Q: length of name token must
On 2015-05-15 AM 05:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am trying to start bgworker from bgworker and create communication
between these process. I have a code based on test_shm_mq. This code fails
because BackendPidGetProc doesn't find related bgworker process, although
the registrant process is
On 2015-05-15 AM 10:39, Amit Langote wrote:
On 2015-05-15 AM 05:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am trying to start bgworker from bgworker and create communication
between these process. I have a code based on test_shm_mq. This code fails
because BackendPidGetProc doesn't find related bgworker
On 15/05/15 10:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:57:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch
is rejected to due to time. I might
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
In Emre Hasegeli's patch for range/inet/geometry opclasses for BRIN, he
chose to move strategy numbers from gist.h to a more central place. He
chose skey.h because that's where btree strategy numbers are defined,
but I'm not sure I agree with
This patch makes pg_upgrade controldata checks more consistent, and adds
a missing check for float8_pass_by_value.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
diff --git
On 05/14/2015 01:43 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com
wrote:
One quick comment:
It would be good to avoid the extra comparisons of the distances, when
the index doesn't return any lossy items. As the patch stands, it adds
On 4/22/15 2:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Attached is a rebased patch with previous comments addressed as I was
looking at it.
Switching this patch as Ready for committer.
Committed, thanks.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On 2015-05-15 AM 10:59, Amit Langote wrote:
On 2015-05-15 AM 10:39, Amit Langote wrote:
On 2015-05-15 AM 05:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am trying to start bgworker from bgworker and create communication
between these process. I have a code based on test_shm_mq. This code fails
because
In Emre Hasegeli's patch for range/inet/geometry opclasses for BRIN, he
chose to move strategy numbers from gist.h to a more central place. He
chose skey.h because that's where btree strategy numbers are defined,
but I'm not sure I agree with that choice.
It's been clear for a while now that
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:59:45AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-14 02:51:42 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
Covering hash aggregation might entail a large preparatory refactoring
of nodeHash.c, but beyond development cost I can't malign that.
You mean execGrouping.c? Afaics nodeHash.c
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:56:53PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
This patch makes pg_upgrade controldata checks more consistent, and adds
a missing check for float8_pass_by_value.
Sorry, I should have mentioned I applied this patch to head. It isn't
significant enough to backpatch.
--
Bruce
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been pulling over Tom's occasional remarks about redoing
grouping_planner - and maybe further layers of the planner - to work
with Paths instead of Plans. I've had difficulty locating all of the
relevant
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
I can, of course, just leave these files well enough alone and just rely
on the numbers not changing (which surely they won't anyway) and
remaining consistent with numbers used in new opclasses (which surely
they will lest
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 5/1/15 12:33 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-04-08 19:19:29 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
I'm not sure what the best way to handle the hand-off from patch
contribution to reviewer/committer. If I start tweaking things then
2015-05-15 3:39 GMT+02:00 Amit Langote langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
On 2015-05-15 AM 05:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am trying to start bgworker from bgworker and create communication
between these process. I have a code based on test_shm_mq. This code
fails
because BackendPidGetProc
2015-05-14 19:12 GMT+02:00 Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com:
On 5/14/15 1:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't think we want to log statements, but we should be able to
log when a job has run and whether it succeeded or not. (log in a
table, not just a logfile).
This isn't
On 2015-05-15 PM 02:13, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2015-05-15 3:39 GMT+02:00 Amit Langote langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
One reason for this may be that the worker was not started with the flag
BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS which is necessary to perform InitProcess() that
would
initialize a PGPROC entry
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
For the reasons I mentioned, I'd like to get to a point where
subquery_planner's output is Paths not Plans as
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:50:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
I still believe that the general approach of chaining vs. a union or CTE
is correct due to the efficiency arguments upthread. My problem is
that, unless I very much misunderstand something, the current
implementation can end up
Hi
Here's an idea for a small 9.6 feature that I don't see on the todo
list already. I noticed that you can't currently CLUSTER on a brin
index. As I understand it, brin indexes are most effective when
blocks have non-overlapping value ranges, and less effective the more
the ranges overlap, so
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:38:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-05-14 02:32:04 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:50:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Andrew, is that a structure you could live with, or not?
Others, what do you think?
Andrew and I discussed
2015-05-14 8:01 GMT+02:00 Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com:
On 5/13/15 1:32 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
5. When command waits to free worker, write to log
6. When command was not be executed due missing workers (and
max_workers
0), write to log
Also
Bruce,
Thank you for webpage trick, I send subscrible mail to
pgadmin-hackers-request.
Actually I want to developer for pgadmin4.
I talk with Dave,
He say, ... You should use git
diff to create patches and then submit them to
pgadmin-hackers ...
So,
If I want run pgadmin4 in Debian Jessie, need
On 2015-05-14 02:51:42 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
Covering hash aggregation might entail a large preparatory refactoring
of nodeHash.c, but beyond development cost I can't malign that.
You mean execGrouping.c? Afaics nodeHash.c isn't involved, and it
doesn't look very interesting to make it so?
Hello, this topic lured me on..
At Wed, 13 May 2015 23:43:57 -0400, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote
in ca+tgmoaqa6bcasgcl8toxwmmoom-d7ebesadz4y58cb+tjq...@mail.gmail.com
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Both of those are problems all right, but
On 5/13/15 1:32 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
5. When command waits to free worker, write to log
6. When command was not be executed due missing workers (and
max_workers
0), write to log
Also unfortunate. We already don't provide enough monitoring
On 2015-05-14 02:32:04 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:50:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
Andrew, is that a structure you could live with, or not?
Others, what do you think?
Andrew and I discussed that very structure upthread:
Hello Robert,
Sorry resent, wrong from
Also, having ; as a end of commands could also help by allowing multiline
commands, but that would break compatibility. Maybe allowing continuations
(\\\n) would be an acceptable compromise.
I loathe violently the convention of using a backslash at the
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
The v15 patch emits a line for each table when reindexing multiple
tables, and emits a line for each index when reindexing single table.
But
This version contains one little change.
In order to be consistent with “\d+ viewname” it uses pg_get_viewdef(oid, /*
pretty */ true) to produce “pretty” output (without additional parentheses).
psql-ev-sv-support-v2.diff
Description: Binary data
On 05 May 2015, at 16:42, Robert Haas
Hi,
owww So sorry :(
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Hi
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Seçkin Alan seckina...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruce,
Thank you for webpage trick, I send subscrible mail to
pgadmin-hackers-request.
Actually I want to developer for
Hi,
The attached patch adds missing NO INHERIT to the CHECK clause in the
synopsis section in the reference page on CREATE FOREIGN TABLE.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_foreign_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_foreign_table.sgml
index abadd83..413b033 100644
Andres == Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
Andres My problem is that, unless I very much misunderstand something,
Andres the current implementation can end up requiring roughly #sets *
Andres #input of additional space for the sidechannel tuplestore in
Andres some bad cases. That
Hi
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Seçkin Alan seckina...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruce,
Thank you for webpage trick, I send subscrible mail to
pgadmin-hackers-request.
Actually I want to developer for pgadmin4.
I talk with Dave,
He say, ... You should use git
diff to create patches and then
Hello guys,
Is it possible to restrict the trust auth method to accept local connections
only using the selinux policy?
Thank you!
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 05/13/15 10:31, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello, this might be somewhat out of place but strongly related
to this patch so I'll propose this here.
This is a proposal of new feature for this patch or asking for
your approval for my moving on this as a different (but very
close) project.
===
On 2015/04/30 2:10, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Authorizing ALTER FOREIGN TABLE as query string that a FDW can use
with IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA is a different feature than what is
proposed in this patch, aka an option for
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com
wrote:
One quick comment:
It would be good to avoid the extra comparisons of the distances, when
the index doesn't return any lossy items. As the patch stands, it adds one
extra copyDistances() call and a
Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org writes:
On 2015-05-13 18:16, Christopher Browne wrote:
I thought that this restriction was alleviated years ago, so I'm a bit
surprised to see this come up in 2015. (Or perhaps Gentoo hasn't
yet opened up some limits??? :-) )
The restriction is
85 matches
Mail list logo
